Results 111 to 120 of about 4,846 (144)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
TARSKI’S ANALYSIS OF LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE AND ETCHEMENDY’S CRITICISM OF TARSKI’S MODAL FALLACY
2006D. Jacquette
exaly +3 more sources
Epistemologia. Rivista italiana di filosofia della scienza, 1997
The paper discusses three aspects of the critique of Tarski's 1936 definition of validity given by \textit{J. Etchemendy} [The concept of logical consequence (1990; Zbl 0743.03002)]. (1) The first is Etchemendy's central claim that the Tarskian definition is prone to both overgenerate (render intuitively invalid inferences valid) and undergenerate ...
MARIANI, MAURO, MORICONI, ENRICO
semanticscholar +6 more sources
The paper discusses three aspects of the critique of Tarski's 1936 definition of validity given by \textit{J. Etchemendy} [The concept of logical consequence (1990; Zbl 0743.03002)]. (1) The first is Etchemendy's central claim that the Tarskian definition is prone to both overgenerate (render intuitively invalid inferences valid) and undergenerate ...
MARIANI, MAURO, MORICONI, ENRICO
semanticscholar +6 more sources
Critical Notice: Jon Barwise and John Etchemendy, The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity
Philosophy of Science, 1989Some criticisms are offered of Barwise and Etchemendy's theory of truth, the principal one being that it violates a feature of truth called “supervenience”.
Anil Gupta
openaire +2 more sources
ETCHEMENDY, TARSKI, AND LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE
Southwest Philosophy Review, 1999J. Bates
openaire +2 more sources

