Results 31 to 40 of about 93 (72)
The separation of church and science. Science and religion offer different worldviews, but are they opposite or complementary? [PDF]
EMBO Rep, 2010 Suran M.
europepmc +1 more source
Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state. [PDF]
Int J Philos Relig, 2017 Elliott D, Soifer E.
europepmc +1 more source
Voluntarism and realism in medieval ethics. [PDF]
J Med Ethics, 1989 Haldane J.
europepmc +1 more source
Theological-ethics and epistemology: The Euthyphro Dilemma and the metaethics of al-Māturīdī
, 2020 Euthyprhon Dilemması, bu değerin kaynağını nereden aldığını sorarak ahlaki bir değere sahip bir tanrıya inanan teistlerin karşılaştığı kafa karıştırıcı bir duruma dikkat çekmektedir. Platon'un kendi adını taşıyan diyalog, tanrının ahlakın kaynağı olduğu şeklindeki tanrı merkezli iddianın bariz sorunlarını tartışır ve ahlakın rasyonel bir biçimde ...
openaire +1 more source
Ethics teaching in medical school: the perception of medical students. [PDF]
Wien Klin WochenschrFaihs L +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
The Euthyphro dilemma, originating from Plato’s dialogue, poses the question: Is something good because the gods command it, or do the gods command it because it is good? This classical paradox highlights a deep tension between arbitrariness and independence in the foundations of morality.
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Religion, morality, and the Euthyphro dilemma
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 1984In what follows, I shall sketch MacBeath 's argument, make some observations c< cerning Kant's understanding of the relationship between morality and religi that are intended to show that MacBeath's analysis has misconstrued the nati of the Euthyphro dilemma, and conclude that Socrates had Euthyphro on 1 ropes after all. MacBeath begins by showing that
George W Harris
exaly +2 more sources
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 1972
but sometimes searching arguments of the Euthyphro, and in the obviously parallel passage in Republic 378(a) to 383(c). Both the early dialogue and the passage in the Republic concerning the censorship of what may legitimately be said concerning the gods involve several metaphysical assumptions.
D. M. MacKinnon, Hugo Meynell
exaly +2 more sources
but sometimes searching arguments of the Euthyphro, and in the obviously parallel passage in Republic 378(a) to 383(c). Both the early dialogue and the passage in the Republic concerning the censorship of what may legitimately be said concerning the gods involve several metaphysical assumptions.
D. M. MacKinnon, Hugo Meynell
exaly +2 more sources