Results 21 to 30 of about 326 (133)
Judicial Performance Review in Arizona: A Critical Assessment
Judicial performance evaluations are a relatively new tool for assessing judges and providing information to voters to help them determine whether to retain judges in contested or retention elections.
Rebecca White Berch, Erin Norris Bass
doaj +2 more sources
Los procesos y programas de evaluación del rendimiento judicial tienden a implicar un modelo normativo abstracto del juez competente. La atención se centra en el funcionario judicial individual, identificando cómo deben realizar su labor los jueces y ...
Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack
doaj
ABSTRACT In an era of proliferating but divergent data protection regimes, the European Union's rights‐based approach and China's sovereignty‐centric model have become two dominant poles of global data governance. This article examines how multinational enterprises navigate compliance under these dual systems and how that compliance is shaped through ...
Yiping Cao
wiley +1 more source
Algoritmos predictivos y perspectiva de género en el proceso penal
La introducción en el proceso judicial de herramientas algorítmicas de evaluación del riesgo para auxiliar al juez debe necesariamente venir precedida de un análisis exhaustivo con perspectiva de género acerca de su impacto sobre los derechos ...
Ana Montesinos García
doaj +1 more source
Interventions to Reduce Child Poverty and Its Determinants: A Rapid Overview of Reviews
ABSTRACT Despite evidence for various child poverty reduction strategies, there is ambiguity regarding the most effective types to inform policy. Thus, we conducted an overview of reviews to systematically identify, appraise, and synthesize interventions for reducing childhood poverty in high‐income country settings.
Omar Dewidar +9 more
wiley +1 more source
Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from Socio-legal Research
Judicial performance evaluation processes and programs tend to imply an abstract, normative model of the proper judge. The focus is on the individual judicial officer, identifying how judges ought to perform their judicial work and assessing any ...
Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack
doaj
Los mínimos argumentales como criterios racionales para evaluar decisiones judiciales.
El presente es un artículo resultado de investigación que tiene como objetivo principal justificar que es posible la evaluación de una decisión judicial con base en criterios de razonabilidad denominados mínimos argumentales.
David Modesto Guette Hernandez +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Abstract The rapid expansion of biodiversity data presents new opportunities to understand and forecast biosphere dynamics. However, disparate and dispersed data, taxonomic and geographic inconsistencies, pervasive quality issues, and a lack of reproducable workflows hinder synthesis, introduce biases and limit accurate assessment of biodiversity ...
Brian J. Enquist +38 more
wiley +1 more source
Researching Justification Texts of a First Instance Court: from Assignment to Results and Reporting
Court decisions are reasoned to legitimize them. Lay people seem to understand little of the work of the courts. One of the questions for court administrators and judges is: for whom do judges write their judgments?
Philip Langbroek, Tina Linden, van der
doaj
ABSTRACT This study explores the production of coherence between Uruguay's agricultural, environmental and water policies amidst growing tensions, which are particularly manifested in conflicts between an expanding agricultural sector and water insecurity for the broader public.
Simon Ryfisch +7 more
wiley +1 more source

