Results 311 to 320 of about 17,544,570 (361)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

-evaluators and -evaluators

Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2009
The scalar evaluation of the aggregation of elements from a complete lattice via the operation meet (join) is compared with the aggregation of scalar evaluations of these elements via a t-norm (t-conorm). Based on this comparison, the notion of a T-evaluator (S-evaluator) is introduced and its basic properties are studied. The relationship between T-(S-
Martin Kalina, Slavka Bodjanova
openaire   +2 more sources

An evaluation of evaluation [PDF]

open access: possibleThe Urban Review, 1974
The present evaluation procedures are useful if looked at as secondary data; if they are seen as broad and essentially complementary to the main business of schooling — student learning, and not as the primary outcome of schooling. When they are seen as direct or primary representations of the quality of programs, they are fraudulent and misleading ...
openaire   +1 more source

Evaluating our Evaluations

College English, 1978
FORTUNATELY FOR TEACHERS of basic writing the student who wrote this remark to complete the statement "After reading the comments on a paper I generally . . ."is not typical. But how do basic writing students react to teacher comments on their papers?
Catherine Lynch, Patricia Klemans
openaire   +2 more sources

Reproducibility: Evaluating the Evaluations [PDF]

open access: possible, 2021
Evaluation is at the heart of reproducibility in research, and the related but distinct concept of replicability. The difference between the two is whether the determination is based on the original author’s source code (replicability), or is independent of the code and based purely on a written description of the method (reproducibility).
Daniel Lopresti, George Nagy
openaire   +1 more source

Evaluating the evaluator: The effects of the valence, sequence and target of evaluations on the perception of the evaluator

International Journal of Psychology, 2017
People commonly want to be perceived as intelligent, as well as be liked by others. Previous research has demonstrated that people who wish to appear intelligent tend to criticise others, and that criticising others indeed leads to the perception of high intelligence.
Nurit Tal-Or, Ayelet Gal-Oz
openaire   +3 more sources

Evaluation of Evaluation '85

Evaluation Practice, 1986
Summary Overall, Evaluation '85 was viewed by the participants in a very positive manner. A high percentage of pre-session participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the quality of their sessions. The most popular features of Evaluation '85 (paper presentation, panels/symposia, and invited speakers) were rated as effective.
openaire   +2 more sources

Evaluation

2016
Leitbegriffe der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention: Glossar zu Konzepten, Strategien und ...
Haack, Gina, Haß, Wolfgang
openaire   +1 more source

Microcomputers in Evaluation

Evaluation Practice, 1984
Summary The electronic transfer of information is one of the most exciting and at the same time most frustrating uses of microcomputers because there are potentially nine components that must all work together. These are: o (1) the sending computer and its operating system, (2) the communication software compatible with the sending computer,
openaire   +2 more sources

Evaluating the Impacts That Impact Evaluations Don’t Evaluate

2015
Development interventions aim to achieve a pre-determined set of positive improvements in the lives of people who receive them. They embody an implicit or explicit theory of change: people’s wellbeing is impaired by certain deficits or challenges they face, so providing specific benefits to them will alleviate these constraints and improve their ...
Keetie Roelen, Stephen Devereux
openaire   +2 more sources

"Evaluating the Evaluators"

Evaluation & the Health Professions, 1978
Critical impediments to successful evalu ation are (1) a lack of organization and support of evaluation, (2) an imbalance between the expectations of top management and the capacity of the evaluation staff, and (3) an inability to develop a satisfactory conceptual framework for planning and managing evaluation activities.
openaire   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy