Results 291 to 300 of about 672,774 (331)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The links between evidentiality, modality, and grammaticalization
Studies About LanguagesThis paper introduces the main notions that are addressed in this special issue, namely evidentiality, modality, and grammaticalization. It defines each notion and briefly synthesizes the literature.
Eric Mélac
semanticscholar +1 more source
Evidentiality as a grammaticalization passenger
Studies About LanguagesThis article investigates the grammaticalization patterns of evidentiality from a cross-linguistic perspective with a focus on Lhasa Tibetan. It documents the history of the evidential morphemes ’dug, -song, -bzhag, and =ze from Old Literary Tibetan ...
Eric Mélac, Joanna Bialek
semanticscholar +1 more source
Evidentiality and stance in YouTube comments on smartphone reviews
Internet Pragmatics, 2019Online participatory environments have become saturated spaces in terms of the opportunities that they offer for the display of different viewpoints and ideologies.
Alejandro Parini, A. Fetzer
semanticscholar +1 more source
Evidentiality in adverbs of manner of perceivability
, 2019This paper presents an analysis of the expression of evidentiality by the English adverbs manifestly, noticeably, patently and visibly (MNPV the results show that MNP&V are evidential by implication in most cases, and also uncover individual differences ...
M. Carretero
semanticscholar +1 more source
Intercultural Pragmatics, 2014
This paper attempts to show that the linguistic or discursive marking of evidentiality plays a role in the performance of illocutionary acts and that its closeness to, and difference from, the attribution of epistemic modality can be explained in the light of an analysis of their respective relations to illocution.
openaire +3 more sources
This paper attempts to show that the linguistic or discursive marking of evidentiality plays a role in the performance of illocutionary acts and that its closeness to, and difference from, the attribution of epistemic modality can be explained in the light of an analysis of their respective relations to illocution.
openaire +3 more sources
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2011
AbstractTwo recent arguments purport to find a new and firmer foundation for evidentialism in the very nature of the concept of belief. Evidentialism is claimed to be a conceptual truth about belief, and pragmatism to be ruled out, conceptually. But can the conclusion of such conceptual arguments be regarded as the denial of pragmatism?
openaire +2 more sources
AbstractTwo recent arguments purport to find a new and firmer foundation for evidentialism in the very nature of the concept of belief. Evidentialism is claimed to be a conceptual truth about belief, and pragmatism to be ruled out, conceptually. But can the conclusion of such conceptual arguments be regarded as the denial of pragmatism?
openaire +2 more sources
2018
Statements are always under the threat of the potential counter-question How do you know? To pre-empt this question, language users often indicate what kind of access they had to the communicated content: Their own perception, inference from other information, ‘hearsay’, etc.
Foolen, A.P., Hoop, H. de, Mulder, G.J.
openaire +2 more sources
Statements are always under the threat of the potential counter-question How do you know? To pre-empt this question, language users often indicate what kind of access they had to the communicated content: Their own perception, inference from other information, ‘hearsay’, etc.
Foolen, A.P., Hoop, H. de, Mulder, G.J.
openaire +2 more sources
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2020
Abstract So far the book has worked on the assumption that the confrontation with contrary evidence always requires rational believers to reduce their credence in the relevant propositions. This chapter introduces the notion of “evidential preemption,” which occurs when a testifier, in addition to offering testimony that p, also warns ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract So far the book has worked on the assumption that the confrontation with contrary evidence always requires rational believers to reduce their credence in the relevant propositions. This chapter introduces the notion of “evidential preemption,” which occurs when a testifier, in addition to offering testimony that p, also warns ...
openaire +1 more source
2014
In recent decades, linguists have significantly advanced our understanding of the grammatical properties of evidentials, but their social and interactional properties and uses have received less attention. This volume, originally published as a special issue of Pragmatics and Society (issue 3:2, 2012), draws together complementary perspectives on the ...
Lev Michael, Janis B. Nuckolls
openaire +2 more sources
In recent decades, linguists have significantly advanced our understanding of the grammatical properties of evidentials, but their social and interactional properties and uses have received less attention. This volume, originally published as a special issue of Pragmatics and Society (issue 3:2, 2012), draws together complementary perspectives on the ...
Lev Michael, Janis B. Nuckolls
openaire +2 more sources
Epistemic Modalities and Evidentiality in Cross-Linguistic Perspective
, 2022semanticscholar +1 more source