Results 241 to 250 of about 32,217 (299)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 2010
The debate swirling around medical negligence litigation continues. The medical profession, consumer and patient advocacy groups, think tanks, the insurance industry, and the trial bar all continue to provide diverse opinions on this issue. The notion that professional liability lawsuits have created a so-called crisis has been around for decades1 ...
Alexander R, Vaccaro +5 more
openaire +2 more sources
The debate swirling around medical negligence litigation continues. The medical profession, consumer and patient advocacy groups, think tanks, the insurance industry, and the trial bar all continue to provide diverse opinions on this issue. The notion that professional liability lawsuits have created a so-called crisis has been around for decades1 ...
Alexander R, Vaccaro +5 more
openaire +2 more sources
Expert Psychological Testimony*
Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011Psychologists serve as expert witnesses in criminal and civil cases and testify about a wide range of clinical, cognitive, developmental, industrial-organizational, biological, and social psychological topics. We review the topics about which psychologists offer testimony, the rules governing the admissibility of expert testimony, and contemporary ...
Brian L. Cutler, Margaret Bull Kovera
openaire +1 more source
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1988
Lawyers do not testify; witnesses do. No matter how compelling the opening and closing statements of the trial lawyer, every juror is instructed that he or she is bound to reach conclusions that are based not on what the lawyers say, but on the evidence.
N K, Quinn, M A, Capron
openaire +2 more sources
Lawyers do not testify; witnesses do. No matter how compelling the opening and closing statements of the trial lawyer, every juror is instructed that he or she is bound to reach conclusions that are based not on what the lawyers say, but on the evidence.
N K, Quinn, M A, Capron
openaire +2 more sources
Neurology, 1996
To the Editor: There is little doubt that my previous editorial on expert witness testimony [1] aroused considerable positive sentiments in the neurologic community. To date, the Academy has received several allegations of improper testimony by members.
openaire +3 more sources
To the Editor: There is little doubt that my previous editorial on expert witness testimony [1] aroused considerable positive sentiments in the neurologic community. To date, the Academy has received several allegations of improper testimony by members.
openaire +3 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1976
BURTON L. Wise1has noted the need to restructure the testimony of expert medical witnesses in courts of law in the United States. The main change proposed is that experts testify as unbiased witnesses reporting to the court, the material to be used by one or both sides as they see fit. This proposal is so obviously reasonable and equitable that it is a
openaire +2 more sources
BURTON L. Wise1has noted the need to restructure the testimony of expert medical witnesses in courts of law in the United States. The main change proposed is that experts testify as unbiased witnesses reporting to the court, the material to be used by one or both sides as they see fit. This proposal is so obviously reasonable and equitable that it is a
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2005
The question of whether the normative testimony of ethics experts should be admissible under the rules of evidence has been the subject of much debate. Professor Imwinkelried's paper is an effort to get us, for a moment, to change that subject. He seeks to turn our attention, instead, to a means by which bioethics experts’ normative analyses might come
openaire +2 more sources
The question of whether the normative testimony of ethics experts should be admissible under the rules of evidence has been the subject of much debate. Professor Imwinkelried's paper is an effort to get us, for a moment, to change that subject. He seeks to turn our attention, instead, to a means by which bioethics experts’ normative analyses might come
openaire +2 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1977
To the Editor.— I am concerned and dismayed by Dr Charles Aring's position on expert medical testimony in court (234:569, 1976). There are many who will agree with his boycotting the legal system unless he can appear on his own terms as a friend of the court. There are also those who disagree.
openaire +2 more sources
To the Editor.— I am concerned and dismayed by Dr Charles Aring's position on expert medical testimony in court (234:569, 1976). There are many who will agree with his boycotting the legal system unless he can appear on his own terms as a friend of the court. There are also those who disagree.
openaire +2 more sources