Results 51 to 60 of about 31,046 (301)
Robust Trust in Expert Testimony
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2015 The standard of proof in criminal trials should require that the evidence presented by the prosecution is robust. This requirement of robustness says that it must be unlikely that additional information would change the probability that the defendant is ...
Christian Dahlman +2 more
doaj
Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka
Między Oryginałem a Przekładem, 2019 Equivalence of Written Translation in the Context of the Assessment of the Credibility of Witness Testimony This article presents a study on the equivalence of written translation in the context of the assessment of the credibility of witness testimony ...
Katarzyna Liber-Kwiecińska +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Tissue‐Resident Myeloid and Histiocytic Cells in Health and Disease: Novel Emerging Concepts
American Journal of Hematology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Although all myeloid cells are considered to derive from hematopoietic stem cells, the cells in each myeloid lineage are heterogeneous populations, and their distribution and functions vary, depending on underlying physiologic and pathologic processes, age, sex, and genetic and epigenetic signatures.
Peter Valent +27 more
wiley +1 more source
KEABSAHAN KETERANGAN AHLI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
SASI, 2014 Proof needed to convince the judge that there has been a criminal offense, after HIR to the Code of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Procedure Code) was added Specification Expert as a form of evidence, in the Corruption MCK Ambon City in 2012, the ...
Erwin Ubwarin
doaj
Analysis of errors in forensic science
Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine, 2017 Reliability of expert testimony is one of the foundations of judicial justice. Both expert bias and scientific errors affect the reliability of expert opinion, which in turn affects the trustworthiness of the findings of fact in legal proceedings. Expert
Mingxiao Du
doaj +1 more source
Policing Expert Testimony [PDF]
Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 1999 Robert H. Aicher, Esq., Sonoma, CA , is general counsel to ASAPS. Despite the authority given to trial judges to exclude “junk science”—or, stated conversely, to admit only expert opinions based on empirically tested theories published in peer-reviewed journals1—expert testimony is generally suspect for 3 reasons inherent in our adversarial court ...
R AICHER, A GENERALCOUNSELTOASAPS
openaire +1 more source
The Politics of Framing the Student Problem: Inquiries Into Australian Civics Education, 2006–2024
Australian Journal of Social Issues, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Recurring debates about civics, the kinds of history that should, and should not, be taught in school, and ‘standards debates’ about the ‘basics’ typically follow on the heels of recurring moral panics about the ‘declining’ state of ‘our’ education system.
Patrick O'Keeffe +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Теория и практика судебной экспертизы, 2017 The paper examines the problem of using expert testimony and the results of search operations in adversarial courts in keeping with decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights.
Irina E. Nikitina
doaj +1 more source
Misjudging early embryo mortality in natural human reproduction [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
F1000Research, 2020 In 2002, in a judgment relating to the use of the morning-after pill, Mr Justice Munby held that pregnancy begins with the implantation of an embryo into the uterus of a woman.
Gavin E. Jarvis
doaj +1 more source
Happy 75th National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Annals of Neurology, EarlyView.For 75 years the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke has led neurological research in the US. Many thousands of people have volunteered in research and thousands of investigators devoted their careers to pursuing better treatments of neurological disorders.
Walter J. Koroshetz
wiley +1 more source