Results 51 to 60 of about 281,629 (295)
Robust Trust in Expert Testimony
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2015 The standard of proof in criminal trials should require that the evidence presented by the prosecution is robust. This requirement of robustness says that it must be unlikely that additional information would change the probability that the defendant is ...
Christian Dahlman +2 more
doaj
Medical expertise in non-contentious proceedings [PDF]
Vojnosanitetski Pregled, 2018 nema
Trgovčević-Prokić Milena +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Evaluating Future Dangerousness and Need for Treatment: The Roles of Expert Testimony, Attributional Complexity, and Victim Type [PDF]
, 2013 In the current study, we explored the effect of risk-assessment testimony, attributional complexity, and victim type on participants’ perceptions of the dangerousness of a sexually violent person and his need for treatment. Participants read details of a
Gamache, Kyle +2 more
core +1 more source
Australian Journal of Social Issues, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Little is known about the impacts of the disclosure, or the non‐disclosure, of medical conditions associated with neurodiversity in the context of court proceedings and hearings before tribunals and commissions. This paper examines the experiences of twenty‐three Queensland Judges, Magistrates, and Tribunal and Commission Members with ...
Danielle Bozin +5 more
wiley +1 more source
KEABSAHAN KETERANGAN AHLI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
SASI, 2014 Proof needed to convince the judge that there has been a criminal offense, after HIR to the Code of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Procedure Code) was added Specification Expert as a form of evidence, in the Corruption MCK Ambon City in 2012, the ...
Erwin Ubwarin
doaj
Ekwiwalencja przekładu w kontekście oceny wiarygodności zeznań świadka
Między Oryginałem a Przekładem, 2019 Equivalence of Written Translation in the Context of the Assessment of the Credibility of Witness Testimony This article presents a study on the equivalence of written translation in the context of the assessment of the credibility of witness testimony ...
Katarzyna Liber-Kwiecińska +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Competition in the Courtroom: When Does Expert Testimony Improve Jurors’ Decisions? [PDF]
, 2009 Many scholars lament the increasing complexity of jury trials and question whether the testimony of competing experts helps unsophisticated jurors to make informed decisions.
Boudreau, Cheryl, McCubbins, Mathew D.
core +1 more source
Nothing to See Here: Researching Non‐Recent Child Abuse in Schools and the Politics of Silence
Australian Journal of Social Issues, EarlyView.ABSTRACT While institutions, including schools, have responsibilities to protect children from harm, responses to instances of child sexual abuse have often exhibited avoidance and denial. Recent public inquiries in Australia revealed that some institutions, particularly in the Catholic sector, employed a deliberate strategy of silence which was used ...
John Crowley +2 more
wiley +1 more source
The Probative Value of Smart Proofs Looking at the Thematic and Methodological Evidence
حقوق فناوریهای نوینApplying artificial intelligence in criminal investigations makes it necessary to examine the probative value of intelligent evidence such as silent testimony, admission of confession, expert theory, and intelligent tracker in criminal policy based on ...
Mohammad Ali Haji Deh Abadi +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Analysis of errors in forensic science
Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine, 2017 Reliability of expert testimony is one of the foundations of judicial justice. Both expert bias and scientific errors affect the reliability of expert opinion, which in turn affects the trustworthiness of the findings of fact in legal proceedings. Expert
Mingxiao Du
doaj +1 more source