Results 211 to 220 of about 4,550 (256)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The Dichotomy of the Expert Witness
Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1986Abstract The expert on either side is either right, partially right, wrong, or wrong and dishonest. Even strongly opposed testimony is not evidence of dishonesty, although it is clear at least one expert is wrong. Some differences are the result of legitimate differences of opinion.
openaire +2 more sources
The Role of the Expert Witness
Surgical Clinics of North America, 2007The role of expert witnesses in medical malpractice litigation is often misunderstood. Much maligned, the expert has been the subject of castigation by a range of people, from his professional colleagues to the jurists who preside over his testimony. From an academic perspective, the expert witness is a necessary evil, and his denigration is his own ...
openaire +2 more sources
The Dermatologist as Expert Witness
Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 2005Expert witnesses are practitioners who provide varying opinions for use in a variety of legal forums. There are many technical requirements to be satisfied before a tribunal recognizes such opinions. Regulation, rules, restrictions and potential liability must be considered.
openaire +2 more sources
New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
To the Editor: Some physicians in the United States generate substantial incomes by testifying as expert witnesses in malpractice cases — frequently against other physicians. They hawk their wares in legal journals, offering their services to either side of any case.
openaire +2 more sources
To the Editor: Some physicians in the United States generate substantial incomes by testifying as expert witnesses in malpractice cases — frequently against other physicians. They hawk their wares in legal journals, offering their services to either side of any case.
openaire +2 more sources
Medical Journal of Australia, 1993
The courts are entitled to expect both medical competence and expertise in conveying medical knowledge. Doctors should be familiar with their obligations as competent expert medical witnesses. There is a pressing need for medical schools to train doctors in the skills required of an expert medical witness.
openaire +2 more sources
The courts are entitled to expect both medical competence and expertise in conveying medical knowledge. Doctors should be familiar with their obligations as competent expert medical witnesses. There is a pressing need for medical schools to train doctors in the skills required of an expert medical witness.
openaire +2 more sources
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1984
Expert witness for the prosecution? Expert witness for the defense? Expert witness for the court? How about unbiased expert witness for the truth? Elsewhere in this issue, Goldsmith 1,2 describes in two MEDICAL NEWS stories the evolving opinion pertaining to the practice of being an expert witness, with particular emphasis on forensic psychiatry ...
openaire +2 more sources
Expert witness for the prosecution? Expert witness for the defense? Expert witness for the court? How about unbiased expert witness for the truth? Elsewhere in this issue, Goldsmith 1,2 describes in two MEDICAL NEWS stories the evolving opinion pertaining to the practice of being an expert witness, with particular emphasis on forensic psychiatry ...
openaire +2 more sources