Results 241 to 250 of about 3,416,168 (298)

Experts and Non-Experts [PDF]

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
The paper is concerned with the interaction between two agents: an expert, announcing his probability that a particular state of the world will occur, and a non-expert decision-maker, who takes action according to his posterior beliefs. The decision-maker considers the expert an experiment of uncertain reliability and takes the received messages as the
Valsecchi, Irene, Valsecchi, Irene
openaire   +4 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Expert Advice for the Expert Witness

Advances in Anesthesia, 2023
The malpractice system in the United States provides civil remedies-payment-for patients injured by non-standard-of-care medical practice. Anesthesiologists are not sued often, but one can still expect to be named in a suit at least once in their career.
openaire   +2 more sources

Expert systems and expert behavior

Journal of Medical Systems, 1992
Iliad 4.0 and QMR 2.03 are computer-based diagnostic knowledge bases that can play many roles in decision support and other areas of medical practice, but neither appears ready to assume the role of an expert diagnostic consultant. In contrast to human experts, these programs have problems related to recognition of their own limitations, interpretation
W, Sumner, E K, Shultz
openaire   +2 more sources

Fields of Experts

International Journal of Computer Vision, 2009
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Stefan Roth 0001, Michael J. Black
openaire   +2 more sources

18. Experts and expert evidence

2016
This chapter focuses on the role of experts in civil actions. It considers when expert support is needed—whether as part of the evidence submitted in the action or as part of the advice sought to prepare the client’s case or perhaps for both situations.
Susan Cunningham-Hill, Karen Elder
openaire   +1 more source

18. Experts and Expert Evidence

2017
This chapter focuses on the role of experts in civil actions. It considers when expert support is needed—whether as part of the evidence submitted in the action or as part of the advice sought to prepare the client’s case or perhaps for both situations.
Susan Cunningham-Hill, Karen Elder
openaire   +1 more source

Forensic experts' perceptions of expert bias

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2012
How do expert witnesses perceive the possible biases of their fellow expert witnesses? Participants, who were attendees at a workshop at the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law were asked to rate for their biasing potential a number of situations that might affect the behavior of an opposing expert. A Rasch analysis produced a linear scale as to the
Michael Lamport, Commons, Patrice Marie, Miller, Eva Yujia, Li, Thomas Gordon, Gutheil   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Experts' systems instead of expert systems

AI & Society, 1995
By studying several cases of expert systems' use, a variety of difficulties were identified as directly depending on specific characteristics of experts and their tasks. This concerns more than the questions: “May experts be replaced by machines?” or “Is experts' knowledge explicable?”.
Thomas Herrmann, Katharina Just
openaire   +1 more source

Expert Characteristics: Implications for Expert Systems

2021
While expert systems are artificial intelligence (AI) agents, they share many common characteristics with human experts. As technology progresses, such systems are not just able to make simple decisions following "simplistic" linear logical protocols; they "behave" as real experts in at least two ways: by demonstrating superb decision-making skills and
openaire   +2 more sources