Results 1 to 10 of about 901,079 (343)

Federal Rules of Evidence update of Rule 502. [PDF]

open access: yesJ Chiropr Med, 2009
It is prudent for the forensic examiner to review the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) periodically for new rules, new editions, and addendums. The rules by which a court determines what evidence is admissible at trial are called rules of evidence. In the United States, federal courts follow the FRE, whereas the state courts follow their own rules ...
Cupon LN.
europepmc   +4 more sources

Clues in U.S. law - a comparative study in the Federal Rules of Evidence with some of the laws of evidence [PDF]

open access: goldالرافدین للحقوق, 2013
This research includes the study of presumption in American law and other comparative legal system, which is considerd as one of the Anglo-American laws, contains the use of presumptions as a method of evidence.
Wael Moaied Jalal Eddin Al - Jalili
doaj   +2 more sources

論美國專利訴訟之專家證人資格―以美國聯邦巡迴上訴法院與聯邦證據規則第702條有關之判決為中心 Qualification of Expert Witnesses in United States Patent Litigation: A Review of Federal Circuit Case Law Regarding Rule 702 of the Federal [PDF]

open access: greenKējì Fǎxué Pínglùn, 2014
專家證人在美國專利訴訟中扮演重要的角色。專利訴訟常涉及技術議題,需要技術專家的參與來幫助解釋請求項或協助陪審團瞭解專利技術或侵權物。當處理可專利性爭點時,技術專家則是事實認定者很好的顧問。此外,賠償金計算需要產業或財務會計理論等知識。賠償金專家必須參與,以能讓金錢式賠償的爭議得以處理。雖然專家證人的角色重要,但對相關判例法的研究不是很多,特別是針對證人資格或證詞採納等議題。因此,本文在探討巡迴上訴法院針對該類議題之判例。美國專利法並無著墨專家證人之規範,而相關議題主要是聯邦證據規則第702 條所主導 ...
陳秉訓 Ping-Hsun Chen
doaj   +3 more sources

The Mechanisms of Memory and the Federal Rules of Evidence: A Psychological Perspective

open access: gold, 2023
Eyewitness misidentifications have contributed to many wrongful convictions. However, despite expressing high confidence at trial, many of the eyewitnesses in these cases did otherwise—often correctly providing evidence of innocence—on the first test of uncontaminated memory conducted early in a police investigation.
Anne S Yilmaz   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

The Federal rules of emojis: a proposed framework for handling emoji evidence in trial contexts

open access: diamondRussian Journal of Economics and Law
The article was first published in English language by Fordham Law Review. For more information, please contact tmelnick@law.fordham.eduFor original publication: Hurzeler, M. (2023).
M. Hurzeler
doaj   +3 more sources

Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and Criminal Cases

open access: greenSSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
This article examines United States v. Davis, 596 F.3d 852 (D.C. Cir. 2010) to illustrate the kind of protection Federal Rule of Evidence 408 can afford a criminal defendant who seeks to exclude evidence of an offer to settle what appears to be a civil dispute.
Stephen A. Saltzburg
openaire   +3 more sources

The Incomplete Rule of Completeness: Taking a Stand on Federal Rule of Evidence 106

open access: greenSSRN Electronic Journal, 2020
The common law Rule of Completeness served an important role in Anglo-American jurisprudence for centuries. Historically, it was a rule guided by principles of fundamental fairness and was designed to prevent parties from introducing incomplete and misleading statements at trial.
Louisa Heiny, Emily Nuvan
openaire   +3 more sources

Concurrence of Crimes under Ethiopian Law: General Principles vis-à-vis Tax Law

open access: yesMizan Law Review, 2023
One or successive act(s) may lead to multiple criminality. According to the principle of unity of guilt and penalty, however, one provision punishes the combination of acts flowing from a single criminal guilt.
Leake Mekonen Tesfay
doaj   +1 more source

The Dilemmas of Silence: Evidence, Indigenous Traditional Knowledge and Secrecy in Four Cases Involving Indigenous Peoples in Cultural and Territorial Isolation

open access: yesAndares: Revista de Derechos Humanos y de la Naturaleza, 2023
Within many Indigenous cultures, traditional and spiritual knowledge is considered secret. It requires initiation and is safeguarded by different groups or levels of religious authority within a community.
Nina Valerie Kolowratnik
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy