Results 1 to 10 of about 209 (151)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
An Analysis of Emotions in Voice with Forensic Phonetics
Modern Studies in English Language & Literature, 2018exaly +2 more sources
Phonetic content impact on Forensic Voice Comparison
2016 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 2016Forensic Voice Comparison (FVC) is increasingly using the likelihood ratio (LR) in order to indicate whether the evidence supports the prosecution (same-speaker) or defender (different-speakers) hypotheses. In addition to support one hypothesis, the LR provides a theoretically founded estimate of the relative strength of its support.
Ajili, Moez +4 more
openaire +1 more source
A study of automatic phonetic segmentation for forensic voice comparison
2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2012Forensic voice comparison (FVC) systems have often involved manual annotation of usable phonetic units, requiring substantial human labor. Recent research has shown the efficacy of automatic methods in FVC, and this paper investigates automatic phonetic segmentation in FVC systems.
Chee Cheun Huang, Julien Epps
openaire +1 more source
Forensic anthropometry from voice: An articulatory-phonetic approach
2016 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2016This paper addresses a problem that is of paramount importance in solving crimes wherein voice may be key evidence, or the only evidence: that of describing the perpetrator. The term Forensic anthropometry from voice refers to the deduction of the speaker's physical dimensions from voice.
Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj, Deniz Gençaga
openaire +1 more source
Whose voice is that? Challenges in forensic phonetics
2014In this paper, we explore speaker recognition as a process that is based partly on analysis of phonetic and linguistic features and partly on pattern recognition (Gestalt perception). Central to this paper is the challenge to incorporate the dual nature of speaker recognition in forensic casework. To meet this challenge, we propose the so-called “blind
Tina Cambier-Langeveld +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Nonverbal Vocalisations – A Forensic Phonetic Perspective
2020This contribution approaches nonverbal vocalisations from an angle which is probably quite different from most other perspectives – its usability for forensic speaker comparison purposes. Thus the question is whether and if so, to what extent, nonverbal vocalisations are speaker specific.
openaire +1 more source