Results 181 to 190 of about 14,154 (265)

On the cognitive processes underlying the verbal overshadowing effect: Culprit descriptions reduce culprit‐presence detection and guessing‐based selection in eyewitness responses to lineups

open access: yesLegal and Criminological Psychology, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose Culprit descriptions by eyewitnesses and eyewitness responses to lineups are essential for criminal investigations—the former to locate possible suspects and the latter to provide information relevant to determining guilt or innocence.
Amelie Therre   +5 more
wiley   +1 more source

Statement validity assessment of students' sexual assault accounts: Comparison of honest reports, false denials and false allegations using the criteria‐based content analyses and the verifiability approach

open access: yesLegal and Criminological Psychology, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose In this study, we investigated whether three types of sexual assault (SA) accounts, Full disclosure (Honest), False denial and False allegation, could be distinguished using Criteria‐Based Content Analysis (CBCA) and the Verifiability Approach (VA). Method Student participants were pre‐screened for a history of SA.
Irena Boskovic   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source

Unchained voices: Exploring incarcerated women's pathways to restorative justice

open access: yesLegal and Criminological Psychology, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose Restorative justice (RJ) is an approach to justice that focuses on repairing the harm caused by criminal offences through dialogue, accountability and reparation. Despite its growing recognition, the implementation of RJ programmes within prison settings remains limited, particularly in women's prisons.
Inbal Peleg‐Koriat   +1 more
wiley   +1 more source

The role of defendant race, expert testimony and interrogation coerciveness on Canadian mock jurors' perceptions of recanted confessions

open access: yesLegal and Criminological Psychology, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose In some contexts, US‐based White jurors appear to exhibit a heightened focus on legally relevant information when the defendant is Black as compared to White. The current study tested this ‘watchdog’ effect in the Canadian context by examining mock jurors' decisions using a trial involving a recanted confession with an Indigenous or a ...
Logan Ewanation, Evelyn M. Maeder
wiley   +1 more source

The link between suspect verbosity during investigative interviews and observer‐rapport

open access: yesLegal and Criminological Psychology, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose Rapport enhances both the quantity and quality of information in investigative interviews and is recommended by multiple frameworks and training manuals. As interviewers are trained to associate rapport with more detailed responses, they are likely to assess rapport based on the amount of information provided.
Lynn Weiher   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy