Results 1 to 10 of about 392 (201)
A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation [PDF]
Studia Logica, 2009 The paper starts with a reminder on notions relative to an \textit{argumentation framework}, that is, a binary relation \({att}\) on a set \({Ar}\); intuitively, \({att}(A,B)\) expresses that argument \(A\) attacks argument \(B\). A set \(\mathcal{A}\mathit{rgs}\) of arguments is conflict-free if it contains no pair of arguments one of which attacks ...
Martin W. A. Caminada, Dov M. Gabbay
openaire +5 more sources
On Dynamics in Structured Argumentation Formalisms
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2022 This paper is a contribution to the research on dynamics in assumption-based argumentation (ABA). We investigate situations where a given knowledge base undergoes certain changes. We show that two frequently investigated problems, namely enforcement of a given target atom and deciding strong equivalence of two given ABA frameworks, are intractable in ...
Anna Rapberger, Markus Ulbricht 0001
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2023 Human and artificial reasoning has to deal with uncertain environments. Ideally, probabilistic information is available. However, sometimes probabilistic information may not be precise or it is missing entirely.
Christian Straßer, Lisa Michajlova
doaj +1 more source
Prioritized norms in formal argumentation [PDF]
Journal of Logic and Computation, 2018 To resolve conflicts among norms, various nonmonotonic formalisms can be used to perform prioritized normative reasoning. Meanwhile, formal argumentation provides a way to represent nonmonotonic logics. In this paper, we propose a representation of prioritized normative reasoning by argumentation.
Beishui Liao +3 more
openaire +7 more sources
Argumentation and explanation in the law
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2023 This article investigates the conceptual connection between argumentation and explanation in the law and provides a formal account of it. To do so, the methods used are conceptual analysis from legal theory and formal argumentation from AI.
Antonino Rotolo +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation.
PLoS ONE, 2022 According to the Argumentative Theory, human reasoning has an argumentative function, which consists of devising and evaluating arguments for and against various claims.
Mathieu Guillaume +3 more
doaj +1 more source
The Language of Argumentation: A Book Review
Journal of Language and Education, 2021 The Language of Argumentation by Ronny Boogaart, Henrike Jansen, & Maarten van Leeuwen (Eds). Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2021 aims to provide important theoretical insights to the international community of argumentation theorists by ...
Nico Irawan, Tri Febrianti Valentina
doaj +1 more source
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions
Informal Logic, 2022 In this paper, we devise a network that consists of argumentation schemes and critical questions that participants in debates can use to easily construct arguments that attack or support former arguments.
Sung-Jun Pyon, Yong-Sok Ri
doaj +1 more source
An argumentation semantics for rational human evaluation of arguments
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2023 In abstract argumentation theory, many argumentation semantics have been proposed for evaluating argumentation frameworks. This article is based on the following research question: Which semantics corresponds well to what humans consider a rational ...
Marcos Cramer, Leendert van der Torre
doaj +1 more source