Results 231 to 240 of about 52,358 (282)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
One Jesus and Four Primitive Gospels
Harvard Theological Review, 1968To deal with the problem of the “historical” Jesus is to deal with the synoptic Gospels (with occasional appropriations of Johan-nine material). To use the apocryphal Gospels does not seem to be advisable, since their inclusion is beset with a number of notorious difficulties.
openaire +3 more sources
The Hermeneutical Significance of Four Gospels
Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology, 1979The fact of four different Gospels can be faced as a theological opportunity rather than as a merely historical problem by the hermeneutic of an understanding of Christianity as based upon the christological dogma.
openaire +3 more sources
2002
Abstract Some thirty Christian writings which date from before c. ad 600 refer to themselves as ‘gospels’, or have been so described by others. In later centuries from time to time further gospels which were certainly hoaxes or forgeries appeared. The thirty or so earlier gospels are a very diverse set of writings.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Some thirty Christian writings which date from before c. ad 600 refer to themselves as ‘gospels’, or have been so described by others. In later centuries from time to time further gospels which were certainly hoaxes or forgeries appeared. The thirty or so earlier gospels are a very diverse set of writings.
openaire +1 more source
Scottish Journal of Theology, 1956
The object of this essay is to offer for consideration a new way of translating the fragment of Papias' Preface quoted by Eusebius, in the belief that it may show that Papias was indeed ‘a man of the primitive age’ (⋯ρχαîos), who flourished about A.D. 80, and whose ‘Interpretation’ did not deal with Matthew's Gospel, still less with Luke's, because the
openaire +1 more source
The object of this essay is to offer for consideration a new way of translating the fragment of Papias' Preface quoted by Eusebius, in the belief that it may show that Papias was indeed ‘a man of the primitive age’ (⋯ρχαîos), who flourished about A.D. 80, and whose ‘Interpretation’ did not deal with Matthew's Gospel, still less with Luke's, because the
openaire +1 more source
A Syriac Four Gospel Book in Diyarbakır
Convivium, 2016The present study deals with codicological, textual and art historical features of the Gospel Book (Tetraevangelium) from the Syrian Orthodox Church Meryem Ana, Diyarbakir (Turkey) that has not been sufficiently known either to scholars of Syriac Christianity or art historians.
Bernabo, Massimo, Kessel, Grigory
openaire +2 more sources
2012
Constantin von Tischendorf (1815–74) was a pioneering textual scholar of the New Testament, who discovered and transcribed early manuscripts, notably the Codex Sinaiticus, his acquisition of which provoked long-lasting controversies. The original German edition of this book appeared in 1865, and sold 2,000 copies in three weeks; this English ...
openaire +2 more sources
Constantin von Tischendorf (1815–74) was a pioneering textual scholar of the New Testament, who discovered and transcribed early manuscripts, notably the Codex Sinaiticus, his acquisition of which provoked long-lasting controversies. The original German edition of this book appeared in 1865, and sold 2,000 copies in three weeks; this English ...
openaire +2 more sources
Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology, 1979
The differences between the four canonical gospels are ultimately the expression of distinctive Christologics which represent the refraction of the significance of Jesus for the church.
openaire +1 more source
The differences between the four canonical gospels are ultimately the expression of distinctive Christologics which represent the refraction of the significance of Jesus for the church.
openaire +1 more source
New Blackfriars, 1969
Dr John Marsh, in his excellent Penguin commentary on St John’s gospel, remarks that ‘the gospels read so very much like historical narratives of what took place that it requires effort not to treat them exclusively as such, but to understand them as much more concerned to indicate what was going on in the narrative provided’ (p. 52). One must make the
openaire +1 more source
Dr John Marsh, in his excellent Penguin commentary on St John’s gospel, remarks that ‘the gospels read so very much like historical narratives of what took place that it requires effort not to treat them exclusively as such, but to understand them as much more concerned to indicate what was going on in the narrative provided’ (p. 52). One must make the
openaire +1 more source

