Results 211 to 220 of about 43,417 (289)

Dealing With Conflicts in Medical Decisions: Epistemic Reasonable Disagreement Between Parents and Medical Staff

open access: yesBioethics, Volume 40, Issue 8, Page 878-885, October 2026.
ABSTRACT Many controversies in medical ethics, particularly those involving conflicts between parents and medical staff over decisions about child patients, are challenging to manage without causing significant polarization and communication issues. This is primarily because the parties involved—parents and physicians—operate at different epistemic ...
Chiara Innorta
wiley   +1 more source

Should Terminal Sedation Be Expanded to Individuals Who Choose to Die Via the Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking?

open access: yesBioethics, Volume 40, Issue 8, Page 886-892, October 2026.
ABSTRACT The voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is a phenomenon whereby an individual with decision‐making capacity chooses to cease eating and drinking with the intention of ending their own life. This is widely acknowledged as a lawful, albeit uncommon, end‐of‐life decision.
Laura Gilbertson   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

A Bioethical Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of War

open access: yes
Bioethics, Volume 40, Issue 8, Page 842-844, October 2026.
Funda Gülay Kadioglu
wiley   +1 more source

Should Moral Repair Be Offered to Morally Injured Laboratory Animal Technicians?

open access: yesBioethics, Volume 40, Issue 8, Page 893-899, October 2026.
ABSTRACT Lab‐technicians are at risk of sustaining moral injuries when complicit in unethical experiments. Prima facie, it would be puzzling to offer the perpetrator of an unethical experiment psychological support in the form of moral repair. However, we argue that lab technicians are owed moral repair as a special case of our proposed duty of special
John Goris, Jane Johnson
wiley   +1 more source

Le regole della battaglia

open access: yes, 2013
Silvestrini, Gabriella   +7 more
core   +1 more source

Size Does Matter! Prioritizing Rare Diseases for Luck Egalitarian Reasons

open access: yesBioethics, Volume 40, Issue 8, Page 908-914, October 2026.
ABSTRACT Rarity provides a challenging case for contemporary priority setting. On the one hand, many philosophers and economists argue that rarity has no inherent moral value, and thus that rare diseases merit no special treatment in priority setting decisions simply because they are rare.
Didde Boisen Andersen   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy