Results 241 to 250 of about 201,390 (279)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Geometric equivalence of groups
Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 2007zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Bludov, V. V., Gusev, B. V.
openaire +1 more source
Geometrical equivalence of groups
Communications in Algebra, 1999The notion of geometrical equivalence of two algebras, which is basic for this paper, is introduced in [5], [6]. It is motivated in the framework of universal algebraic geometry, in which algebraic varieties are considered in arbitrary varieties of algebras.
B. Plotkin, E. Plotkin, A. Tsurkov
openaire +1 more source
GEOMETRIC EQUIVALENCE OF ALGEBRAS
International Journal of Algebra and Computation, 2001In this paper, we study the geometric equivalence of algebras in several varieties of algebras. We solve some of the problems formulated in [2], in particular, that of geometric equivalence for real-closed fields and finitely generated commutative groups.
openaire +2 more sources
Geometric equivalence of Clifford algebras
Journal of Mathematical Physics, 2006We motivate a notion of geometric equivalence that is not the usual notion of algebraic equivalence (or isomorphism of Clifford algebra). Using this definition tilting to the opposite metric is a geometric equivalence in contrast to such algebraic equivalences as Cℓ(3,0)≅Cℓ(1,2) which are not geometric.
Botman, David M., Joyce, William P.
openaire +2 more sources
Geometric equivalence, geometric similarity, and geometric compatibility of algebras
Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 2007Most attention is focused on conditions laid on the algebras from a given variety, which provide the coincidence of their algebraic geometries. The notions mentioned in the title of the paper play a leading part. Bibliography: 26 titles.
openaire +1 more source
Geometric and conditional geometric equivalences of algebras
Algebra and Logic, 2013Two universal algebras are said to be geometrically equivalent (conditionally geometrically equivalent) if pairs of different systems of termal equations (of quantifier-free elementary formulas) defining common algebraic sets (definable subsets) are properly the same.
openaire +2 more sources
EQUIVALENCE OF STOCHASTIC, KLAUDER AND GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION
International Journal of Modern Physics A, 1992The relativistic generalization of stochastic quantization helps us to introduce a stochastic-phase-space formulation when a relativistic quantum particle appears as a stochastically extended one. The nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is obtained in the sharp point limit.
Hajra, K., Bandyopadhyay, P.
openaire +2 more sources
A Geometric Relationship Between Equivalent Spreads
Designs, Codes and Cryptography, 2003It is well known that a translation plane can be defined by a spread of a projective space \(P = PG(d, q)\) and vice versa. An \(n\)-spread of \(P = PG(d, q)\) is a set of \(n\)-dimensional subspaces partitioning the point set of \(P\). It may occur that an \(n\)-spread of \(PG(d, q)\) and an \(m\)-spread of \(PG(t, q)\) with \(n \neq m \) define the ...
openaire +1 more source
Geometric equivalence of nilpotent groups
Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 2007Nilpotent, torsion free groups are considered. Sufficient conditions are presented for a nilpotent, torsion free group to be geometrically equivalent to its Mal’tsev completion. Also some results are achieved in describing the classes of geometric equivalence of class 2 nilpotent, torsion free groups with center of small rank. Bibliography: 15 titles.
openaire +1 more source
A geometric characterization of “optimality-equivalent” relaxations
Journal of Global Optimization, 2008zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Ben Ameur, Walid, Neto, José
openaire +2 more sources

