Results 321 to 330 of about 2,932,343 (371)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard
Statistics in Medicine, 2001AbstractAs a subject's true disease status is seldom known with certainty, it is necessary to compare the performance of new diagnostic tests with those of a currently accepted but imperfect ‘gold standard’. Errors made by the gold standard mean that the sensitivity and specificity calculated for the new test are biased, and do not correctly estimate ...
D M, Hawkins +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Acta Tropica, 2019
Well-defined diagnostic gold standards are rarely available for the diagnosis of rare diseases such as some tropical infections. Algorithms for reliable test evaluation without gold standard are therefore desirable. On the basis of previous work of Gart and Buck (1966); Rogan and Gladen (1978), and Hui and Walter (1980), a modeling approach for the ...
Andreas, Hahn +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Well-defined diagnostic gold standards are rarely available for the diagnosis of rare diseases such as some tropical infections. Algorithms for reliable test evaluation without gold standard are therefore desirable. On the basis of previous work of Gart and Buck (1966); Rogan and Gladen (1978), and Hui and Walter (1980), a modeling approach for the ...
Andreas, Hahn +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Making diagnoses with multiple tests under no gold standard
2018In many applications, it is common to have multiple diagnostic tests on each subject. When there are multiple tests available, combining tests to incorporate information from various aspects in subjects may be necessary in order to obtain a better diagnostic. For continuous tests, in the presence of a gold standard, we could combine the tests linearly [
openaire +1 more source
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2001
The objective of this study was to assess the cross-culture validity and reliability of a standard psychiatric assessment instrument without the usual "gold standards." Normally criterion validity testing requires comparison with such a standard--usually another instrument or a professional diagnosis.
openaire +2 more sources
The objective of this study was to assess the cross-culture validity and reliability of a standard psychiatric assessment instrument without the usual "gold standards." Normally criterion validity testing requires comparison with such a standard--usually another instrument or a professional diagnosis.
openaire +2 more sources
Comparing Two Diagnostic Tests against the Same "Gold Standard" in the Same Sample
Biometrics, 1997Methods are proposed for comparing two diagnostic tests for the same data where a threshold for positive for each test is specified. One method contrasts the diagnostic tests' estimated risks. A second method compares the two tests' kappa coefficients.
openaire +2 more sources
Sample selection and gold standard testing for a proper group comparison
European Journal of Neurology, 2021Sara Gasparini +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer
Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2021Smita S Joshi, Brian D Badgwell
exaly
Management of glioblastoma: State of the art and future directions
Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2020Aaron Tan, David M Ashley, Giselle Lopez
exaly

