Results 131 to 138 of about 1,687 (138)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Gomesa cipoensis Laitano & L. R. S. Guim. 2017, comb. nov.
2017Published as part of Penha, Túlio Luiz Laitano & Guimarães, Leonardo R. S., 2017, Nomenclatural notes in Gomesa (Oncidiinae, Cymbidieae, Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae) for the Brazilian flora, pp.
Penha, Túlio Luiz Laitano +1 more
openaire +1 more source
TAXON, 2018
AbstractThe nomenclature of 15 orchid names described by João Barbosa Rodrigues and currently treated in the genus Gomesa (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae) is reviewed. Thirteen names (Baptistonia echinata, Gomesa sessilis, Oncidium biflorum, O. geraense, O. hydrophilum, O. montanum, O. nitidum, O. odontochilum, O.
Jonas B. Castro, Rodrigo B. Singer
openaire +1 more source
AbstractThe nomenclature of 15 orchid names described by João Barbosa Rodrigues and currently treated in the genus Gomesa (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae) is reviewed. Thirteen names (Baptistonia echinata, Gomesa sessilis, Oncidium biflorum, O. geraense, O. hydrophilum, O. montanum, O. nitidum, O. odontochilum, O.
Jonas B. Castro, Rodrigo B. Singer
openaire +1 more source
Gomesa tenuiflora Loddiges 1824
1. Gomesa tenuiflora Loddiges (1824: t. 806), as “ Gomeza tenuiflora ”. Type:— TRINIDAD and TOBAGO. Trinidad: s. loc., ex hort., July 1824, R. Woodford sub Messrs. Loddiges s.n. (lost). (lectotype, designated here: original illustration published in the protologue by Loddiges 1824: t. 806!). Notes: — Loddiges (1824) described G.Oliveira, Miguel S. +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Parastacus gomesae Huber, Araujo & Ribeiro 2022
Published as part of Ribeiro, Felipe Bezerra & Araujo, Paula Beatriz, 2024, Taxonomic review of the genus Parastacus Huxley, 1879 (Decapoda: Astacidea: Parastacidae) with description of five new species, pp.Ribeiro, Felipe Bezerra +1 more
openaire +1 more source
Phytotaxa, 2009
Nohawilliamsia, with the single species, N. orthostates, was recently published but the specific designation of this species as the type was omitted, thus making the new names invalidly published. This error and a few other small ones in the transfers of species of Oncidium to Gomesa are corrected.
openaire +1 more source
Nohawilliamsia, with the single species, N. orthostates, was recently published but the specific designation of this species as the type was omitted, thus making the new names invalidly published. This error and a few other small ones in the transfers of species of Oncidium to Gomesa are corrected.
openaire +1 more source
Wulfenia, 2019
Molecular phylogenetics has now provided a new approach to the taxonomy of Oncidiinae and related taxa. The concepts of numerous previously accepted genera and their interrelations have been brought into question. One of the most significant changes in the systematics of Oncidium-like orchids concern the recognition of Gomesa and its closely allied ...
openaire +1 more source
Molecular phylogenetics has now provided a new approach to the taxonomy of Oncidiinae and related taxa. The concepts of numerous previously accepted genera and their interrelations have been brought into question. One of the most significant changes in the systematics of Oncidium-like orchids concern the recognition of Gomesa and its closely allied ...
openaire +1 more source