Results 271 to 280 of about 9,707,299 (330)
Artificial Intelligence Meets Item Analysis (AI meets IA): A Study of Chatbot Training and Performance in detecting and correcting MCQ Flaws. [PDF]
Sabqat M, Khan RA, Jawaid M, Sajjad M.
europepmc +1 more source
LFG-based Features for Noun Number and Article Grammatical Errors
Berend Gábor+3 more
openaire +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
The Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Number
, 2021This volume offers an overview of current research on grammatical number in language. The chapters Part i of the handbook present foundational notions in the study of grammatical number covering the semantic analyses of plurality, the mass–count ...
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia+1 more
semanticscholar +3 more sources
On the grammatical number of relative what
English Studies, 1984(1984). On the grammatical number of relative what. English Studies: Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 256-273.
G. Kjellmer
semanticscholar +3 more sources
Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2015Despite the robustness of the spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and linguistic markedness of response codes (MARC) effect, the mechanisms that underlie these effects are still under debate. In this paper, we investigate the extraction of quantity information from German number words and nouns inflected for singular and plural ...
Timo B. Roettger, Frank Domahs
semanticscholar +4 more sources
Grammatical number and the scale of individuation
Language, 2018Scott Grimm
semanticscholar +3 more sources
Brain and Language, 1999
A wug type of plural production task with Finnish-speaking 10- to 11-year-old normals and 10-year-old SLI children shows that formal transparency of affixation and the lexicality (real words vs pseudowords) of the stimuli affect the performance of both groups.
J. Niemi
semanticscholar +4 more sources
A wug type of plural production task with Finnish-speaking 10- to 11-year-old normals and 10-year-old SLI children shows that formal transparency of affixation and the lexicality (real words vs pseudowords) of the stimuli affect the performance of both groups.
J. Niemi
semanticscholar +4 more sources
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2020
Listeners make use of contextual cues during continuous speech processing that help overcome the limitations of the acoustic input. These semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic cues facilitate prediction of upcoming words and/or reduce the lexical search ...
V. Brown, Neal P. Fox, Julia F. Strand
semanticscholar +1 more source
Listeners make use of contextual cues during continuous speech processing that help overcome the limitations of the acoustic input. These semantic, grammatical, and pragmatic cues facilitate prediction of upcoming words and/or reduce the lexical search ...
V. Brown, Neal P. Fox, Julia F. Strand
semanticscholar +1 more source