Results 91 to 100 of about 1,485 (129)
Generalisations, causal relationships, and moral responsibility [PDF]
, 2016 Picinali, Federico
core +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Hard incompatibilism and its rivals
Philosophical Studies, 2009In this article I develop several responses to my co-authors of Four Views on Free Will. In reply to Manuel Vargas, I suggest a way to clarify his claim that our concepts of free will and moral responsibility should be revised, and I question whether he really proposes to revise the notion of basic desert at stake in the debate.
openaire +1 more source
Hard incompatibilism and the participant attitude
Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 2019AbstractFollowing P. F. Strawson, a number of philosophers have argued that if hard incompatibilism is true, then its truth would undermine the justification or value of our relationships with other persons. In this paper, I offer a novel defense of this claim.
openaire +1 more source
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017
In a challenge to recent writings of Derk Pereboom and Gregg Caruso, Larry Alexander makes the following claim: If one accepts the Pereboom-Caruso “hard incompatibilist” view of choice, which regards blame and retributive punishment as morally unjustified because free will is an illusion, then “normativity completely disappears.” In making this claim ...
openaire +1 more source
In a challenge to recent writings of Derk Pereboom and Gregg Caruso, Larry Alexander makes the following claim: If one accepts the Pereboom-Caruso “hard incompatibilist” view of choice, which regards blame and retributive punishment as morally unjustified because free will is an illusion, then “normativity completely disappears.” In making this claim ...
openaire +1 more source
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017
In a series of recent papers, Derk Pereboom and Gregg Caruso endorse hard incompatibilism. That is, they accept determinism and reject compatibilism (the compatibility of determinism with the free will required for moral responsibility). They thus deny what they call “basic desert moral responsibility” and reject, as the corollaries of basic desert ...
openaire +1 more source
In a series of recent papers, Derk Pereboom and Gregg Caruso endorse hard incompatibilism. That is, they accept determinism and reject compatibilism (the compatibility of determinism with the free will required for moral responsibility). They thus deny what they call “basic desert moral responsibility” and reject, as the corollaries of basic desert ...
openaire +1 more source
No Ethical Advantages of Hard Determinism and Hard Incompatibilism
2011In this talk, I argued that there could not be any ethical advantages if we accept hard determinism or hard incompatibilism in the free will debate.
openaire