Results 161 to 170 of about 933 (203)

Block mapping class groups and their finiteness properties. [PDF]

open access: yesGeom Dedic
Aramayona J   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Resolving the topology of encircling multiple exceptional points. [PDF]

open access: yesNat Commun
Guria C   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Hirota, Fay and geometry. [PDF]

open access: yesLett Math Phys
Eynard B, Oukassi S.
europepmc   +1 more source

ON STABLE HOMOTOPY EQUIVALENCES

The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 1995
Let \(QX = \varinjlim \Omega^n \Sigma^nX\) be the free infinite loop space generated by the space \(X\). Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be finite CW complexes. The authors prove that if \(QX\) and \(QY\) are homotopy equivalent, then for some large integer \(n\), \(\Sigma^nX\) and \(\Sigma^n Y\) are homotopy equivalent.
Bruner, R. R.   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Some Non-Homeomorphic Harmonic Homotopy Equivalences

Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 1996
Let \((M,g)\) be a compact Riemannian manifold of \(\dim M \geq 11\). Theorem: If \(g\) is either negatively curved or if \((M,g)\) is a flat torus, then there is a Riemannian metric \(h\) on \(M\) and a harmonic homotopy equivalence \(f : (M,h) \to (M,g)\); yet \(f\) is not a homeomorphism.
Farrell, F. T., Jones, L. E.
openaire   +1 more source

On equivariant homotopy equivalences

Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática, 1981
A G-homotopy equivalence \(f: X\to Y\) with no G-homotopy inverse is called exotic and so X is called G-exotic homotopy Y. We remark in section 2 that the quasi-equivalences in the book by \textit{T. Petrie} and \textit{W. Iberkleid} [(*) Smooth \(S^ 1\)-manifolds, Lect. Notes Math. 557 (1978; Zbl 0345.57016), p.
openaire   +2 more sources

Extending local homotopy equivalences

Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, 1983
The purpose of this paper is to give an elementary proof of the result of tom Dieck that a local homotopy equivalence f: \(X\to Y\) in a strong enough sense is a global homotopy equivalence [\textit{T. tom Dieck}, Compos. Math. 23, 159-167 (1971; Zbl 0212.558)]. Apart from technical details the present proof is the same as the one in tom Dieck's paper:
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy