Results 211 to 220 of about 7,228,335 (235)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Evaluation of FASTPAC, a New Strategy for Threshold Estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a Glaucomatous Population

Ophthalmology, 1993
A new fast strategy for the estimation of threshold, FASTPAC, has been introduced for the Humphrey Field Analyzer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance, in a glaucomatous population, of FASTPAC compared with the standard full-threshold 4-2-decibel (dB) double-staircase strategy.The sample consisted of 30 glaucoma patients experienced in
Graham Tropé   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Relationship Between Foveal Threshold and Visual Acuity Using the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2007
Evaluate Humphrey visual field (VF) analyzer central 30-2 foveal threshold test for best-corrected visual acuity.Consecutive case series.Both eyes (n = 117) of 59 patients with diseased and healthy eyes presenting for VF analysis were evaluated to determine foveal threshold.
John R Samples, Laurie Dustin
exaly   +3 more sources

Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer

Ophthalmology Glaucoma, 2022
Iqbal Ike K Ahmed   +2 more
exaly   +2 more sources

Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer

Journal of Glaucoma, 2022
Précis: IMO visual function analyzer (IMOvifa), a binocular perimeter, has similar output to the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), but reduced the measurement time. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of IMOvifa, a perimeter that performs binocular visual ...
Takashi, Nishida   +6 more
openaire   +2 more sources

The Normal Visual Field on the Humphrey Field Analyzer

Ophthalmologica, 2010
To provide a bank of normal perimetric data, we tested the central and peripheral visual fields of 102 novice normal subjects using the Humphrey automated perimeter. All eyes used for visual field testing were first carefully examined to be sure that they were, indeed, normal. We calculated population means and standard deviations of each test location
R S, Brenton, C D, Phelps
openaire   +2 more sources

Comparison of Matrix with Humphrey Field Analyzer II with SITA

Optometry and Vision Science, 2015
ABSTRACT Purpose To study the performance of the Matrix perimeter compared with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II (HFA) with the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm over the range of contrast sensitivities each machine could estimate.
Marie-Josée, Fredette   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients

European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020
Purpose: We compared the performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry (FAP) and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in patients with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and healthy subjects. Materials and methods: A total of 60 ...
Morbio, Roberta   +5 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Peripheral Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma by Automated Kinetic Perimetry With the Humphrey Field Analyzer

Archives of Ophthalmology, 1992
A Humphrey automated perimeter was used to measure the central 24 degrees of vision with static threshold targets and the peripheral field with two automatic kinetic stimuli in 100 eyes of 100 patients with glaucoma or a suspicion of glaucoma and to compare the additional information gained with the peripheral tests.
B J, Ballon   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Maximizing the dynamic range of the Humphrey Field Analyzer for blue‐on‐yellow perimetry

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1993
The conditions employed for blue‐on‐yellow perimetry (i.e. a blue stimulus filter and a high luminance yellow background) are in conflict with those that allow a maximum dynamic range. A modification is described for increasing the dynamic range of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) for blue‐on‐yellow perimetry. The position of the HFA stimulus bulb was
C, Hudson, J M, Wild, J, Archer-Hall
openaire   +2 more sources

Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma

Journal of Glaucoma, 2017
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability indices [fixation losses, false negative response rates (FN) and false positive response rates] and threshold sensitivities obtained from glaucoma patients with a Compass perimeter and to compare the same with the Humphrey field analyzer (HFA). Methods:
Harsha L, Rao   +9 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy