Results 11 to 20 of about 11,553 (254)
Use of the impella system in high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a pilot study [PDF]
Background Patients with advanced heart failure are often deemed ineligible for non-cardiac surgery (NCS) due to poor hemodynamic reserve and increased perioperative risk.
Stefano Guarracini +12 more
doaj +2 more sources
Percutaneous Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation in the Current UNOS Allocation System [PDF]
Background: Progressive heart failure cardiogenic shock (HFCS) often requires escalation to temporary or durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to transplant (BTT).
Rohan Goswami +16 more
doaj +2 more sources
Impella-Induced Incessant Ventricular Tachycardia [PDF]
Background: The Impella 2.5 and Impella Cardiac Power (CP) devices (ABIOMED) are used to provide mechanical circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions or cardiogenic shock as a bridge to recovery or destination therapy.
Amir Kaki +7 more
openalex +3 more sources
Weaning from Impella and mobilization of Impella patients [PDF]
AbstractWeaning of patients from Impella is complex and includes evaluation of the underlying disease, which is essential for estimating the potential for heart recovery. Monitoring during the weaning phase with echocardiography and pulmonary artery catheters will be discussed, as well as the use of intravenous and oral heart failure drugs.
Bertoldi, Letizia Fausta +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Impella-Supported Cardiac Surgery
Background: Impella left ventricular assist devices are useful tools for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. The peri-operative use of Impella in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing cardiac surgery, can be valuable for cardiac surgeons to prevent postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Methods: From September 2018
Paolo Masiello +9 more
openalex +2 more sources
Thrombocytopenia with Impella: Not a HIT [PDF]
Key Points The Impella percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist device provides significant ventricular unloading, but at the cost of increased major bleeding, hemolysis, and thrombocytopenia. The present study shows that nearly all patients develop thrombocytopenia within 7 days of Impella insertion with 81% having a >50% decrease.
Arnold H. Seto, Morton J. Kern
openalex +3 more sources
Background: Heart failure–related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) is increasingly common. Moderate/severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is commonly seen in patients presenting with decompensated heart failure and is associated with worse outcomes ...
Rachna Kataria, MD +8 more
doaj +1 more source
Background The clinical efficacy of the Impella for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and cardiogenic shock remains under debate. We thus sought to investigate the protective effects on the heart with the Impella’s early use pre-PCI ...
Daisuke Fukamachi +18 more
doaj +1 more source
Despite the growing utilization of a large microaxial pump, i. e., Impella 5.0 or 5.5 (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) (Impella 5+) for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), adverse events including the necessity of re-implantation have not been well ...
Yukiharu Sugimura +9 more
doaj +1 more source
Use of Impella Devices for Acute Cardiogenic Shock in the Perioperative Period of Cardiac Surgery
Introduction: The Impella ventricular support system is a device that can be inserted percutaneously or directly across the aortic valve to unload the left ventricle.
Serge Sicouri +7 more
doaj +1 more source

