Results 241 to 250 of about 277,734 (275)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Inaccuracy of forehead thermometers
BMJ, 2013I wish to alert readers, both hospital doctors and general practitioners, to the increasing use of forehead thermometers in hospitals in the UK.1 These thermometers are bought because, not needing probe covers, they are cheaper. No formal health technology assessment of these devices has been performed, in the UK or elsewhere.
openaire +2 more sources
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2018
AbstractThis article proposes a new interpretation of mutual information (MI). We examine three extant interpretations of MI by reduction in doubt, by reduction in uncertainty, and by divergence.
William Roche, Tomoji Shogenji
openaire +1 more source
AbstractThis article proposes a new interpretation of mutual information (MI). We examine three extant interpretations of MI by reduction in doubt, by reduction in uncertainty, and by divergence.
William Roche, Tomoji Shogenji
openaire +1 more source
Scientometrics, 2015
In their recent paper, Aleixandre-Benavent et al. (2014) argue that many of the titles of articles published in bibliometric journals are inaccurate. Thus they report ‘23.4 % of the titles contain inaccuracies of some kind... the most frequent of these being the inclusion of a question in the title (seen in 30.9 % of the papers), followed by vague and ...
openaire +1 more source
In their recent paper, Aleixandre-Benavent et al. (2014) argue that many of the titles of articles published in bibliometric journals are inaccurate. Thus they report ‘23.4 % of the titles contain inaccuracies of some kind... the most frequent of these being the inclusion of a question in the title (seen in 30.9 % of the papers), followed by vague and ...
openaire +1 more source
Raw Data: Access to Inaccuracy
Science, 2014In “Raw personal data: providing access” (Policy Forum, 24 January, p. [373][1]), J. E. Lunshof and colleagues argue that donors should have access to raw data derived from their contribution to research or clinical repositories. Fairness, reciprocity, and respect for autonomy are compelling ethical reasons for access, if not for one major problem: the
openaire +2 more sources