Results 61 to 70 of about 35,807 (151)

Long‐term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator compared with transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator in propensity score‐matched patients from Japan

open access: yesJournal of Arrhythmia
Background Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (S‐ICD) has been reported to be non‐inferior to transvenous ICD (TV‐ICD) in terms of device‐related complications and inappropriate shock (IAS).
Yuki Konno   +12 more
doaj   +1 more source

Oversensing caused by trapped air in the header of subcutaneous cardioverter‐defibrillator generator

open access: yesJournal of Arrhythmia, 2023
Takuya Okada   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Selecting Dual Chamber or Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillators: What is the Golden Rule?

open access: yesIndian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, 2003
During the last years, the implantation rate of dual chamber defibrillators (ICD) significantly increased worldwide. In 1999, the proportion of dual chamber ICD implants reached 30% in Europe and 50% in U.S.A.1.
Massimo Santini, Renato Ricci
doaj  

Inappropriate ICD shocks. [PDF]

open access: yesHeart (British Cardiac Society), 2007
Graf, D., Pruvot, E.
openaire   +2 more sources

Inappropriate Shock Delivered By Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator - Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (ICD-CRT) Due To Myopotential Oversensing

open access: yesIndian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, 2009
The clinical efficacy of ICD-CRT therapy depends on accurate sensing of intracardiac signals and sensing algorithms. We report the occurrence of sensing abnormality in a patient with ICD-CRT. In this patient, oversensing of myopotentials during strenuous
Hamid Barakpour   +3 more
doaj  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy