Results 91 to 100 of about 2,443 (199)
Compatibilism and Incompatibilism in Social Cognition [PDF]
Compatibilism is the view that determinism is compatible with acting freely and being morally responsible. Incompatibilism is the opposite view. It is often claimed that compatibilism or incompatibilism is a natural part of ordinary social cognition.
openaire +2 more sources
How Do We Know That We Are Free?
We are naturally disposed to believe of ourselves and others that we are free: that what we do is often and to a considerable extent ‘up to us’ via the exercise of a power of choice to do or to refrain from doing one or more alternatives of which we are ...
Timothy O’Connor
doaj +1 more source
Moral Luck and The Unfairness of Morality [PDF]
Moral luck occurs when factors beyond an agent’s control positively affect how much praise or blame she deserves. Kinds of moral luck are differentiated by the source of lack of control such as the results of her actions, the circumstances in which she ...
Hartman, Robert
core
The silence of self-knowledge [PDF]
Gareth Evans famously affirmed an explanatory connection between answering the question whether p and knowing whether one believes that p. This is commonly interpreted in terms of the idea that judging that p constitutes an adequate basis for the belief ...
Austin J. L. +15 more
core +2 more sources
Systematic review for the serological testing for cold agglutinins: The BEST collaborative study
Transfusion, Volume 64, Issue 7, Page 1331-1349, July 2024.
Marit Jalink +10 more
wiley +1 more source
Allamah Tabatabaii on the Compatibility of the Causal Necessity and the Human Freedom [PDF]
There are two main philosophical theories concerning the explanation of the relation between the causal necessity and the human freedom: 1. Compatibilism, which believes that the causal necessity is compatible with the human freedom, and incompatibilism,
Mohammad Saeedimehr, Saeed Moghaddas
doaj
Why Christians Should Not Be Kaneans about Freedom [PDF]
: In this paper we argue that Robert Kane’s theory of free will cannot accommodate the possibility of a sinless individual who faces morally significant choices because a sinless agent cannot voluntarily accord value to an immoral ...
Bertrand, Michael D., Mulder, Jack
core
Possibilites for divine freedom [PDF]
I examine three accounts of divine freedom. I argue that two recent accounts which attempt to explain God’s freedom without appealing to alternative possibilities fail.
Kittle, Simon
core
Moral responsibility and the irrelevance of physics: Fischer's semi-compatibilism vs anti-fundamentalism [PDF]
[FIRST PARAGRAPH] 'My Way' is a collection of Fischer’s recent work on moral responsibility which provides an excellent overview of the position that he has (with Mark Ravizza) steadily worked over the last twenty years or so to develop, clarify and ...
Steward, H.
core +1 more source
Free will, temptation, and self-control: We must believe in free will, we have no choice (Isaac B. Singer). [PDF]
Baumeister, Sparks, Stillman, and Vohs (2007) sketch a theory of free will as the humanability to exert self-control. Self-control can produce goal-directed behavior, which free will conceptualized as random behavior cannot.
Bruyneel, Sabrina +2 more
core +3 more sources

