Results 121 to 130 of about 173 (155)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

The Case for Incompatibilism

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2002
1. According to R. J. Wallace in Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments, when we ask whether X is morally responsible for some bad act A, we are asking whether X is blameworthy for A. And when we ask whether X is blameworthy for doing A, we are asking whether it would be morally fair to blame him for it.
openaire   +1 more source

Incompatibilism proved

Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 2013
The consequence argument attempts to show that incompatibilism is true by showing that if there is determinism, then we never had, have or will have any choice about anything. Much of the debate on the consequence argument has focused on the “beta” transfer principle, and its improvements.
openaire   +1 more source

Incompatibilism and Prudential Obligation

Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 2010
Take determinism to be the thesis that for any instant, there is exactly one physically possible future (van Inwagen 1983, 3), and understand incompatibilism regarding responsibility to be the view that determinism is incompatible with moral responsibility.
openaire   +1 more source

Incompatibilism and the logic of transfer

Acta Analytica, 2004
Modal arguments for incompatibility of freedom and determinism are typically based on the “transfer principle” for inability to act otherwise (Beta). The principle of agglomerativity (closure under conjunction introduction) is derivable from Beta. The most convincing counterexample to Beta is based on the denial of Agglomeration.
openaire   +1 more source

Time Travel, Freedom, and Incompatibilism

Erkenntnis, 2023
Wasserman Ryan
exaly  

Incompatibilism

Philosophical Studies, 1983
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy