Results 51 to 60 of about 242,414 (178)

The Right of Access to Justice of Individuals in Transnational Antimonopoly Disputes in the Eurasian Economic Union: the Ways of Overcoming the Crisis

Московский журнал международного права
INTRODUCTION. The article essentially deals with the legal mechanism of challenging the Eurasian Economic Commission’s (EEC) acts in the sphere of antimonopoly regulation by individuals in relation to their right of access to justice.MATERIALS AND ...
S. V. Maksimov, A. A. Filimonenko
doaj   +1 more source

A House Built on Shifting Sands: Standing Under the Fair Housing Act After Thompson v. North American Stainless [PDF]

, 2017
For decades, the Supreme Court construed standing under the Fair Housing Act broadly; any party could bring suit as long as it met Constitutional Standing requirements. In January 2011, in Thompson v.
Vanderhoef, Eric
core   +1 more source

Defamation Ordinance 2002: Defamation Law has Not Come of Age Yet in Pakistan

Policy Perspectives
Defamation harms one’s reputation, exposing an individual to ridicule or contempt. Defamation laws aim to strike a delicate balance between the constitutional right to freedom of expression and the protection of an individual’s reputation.
Farqaleet Khokhar
doaj   +1 more source

The Supreme Court, Due Process and State Income Taxation of Trusts [PDF]

, 2019
What are the constitutional limits on a state\u27s power to tax a trust with no connection to the state, other than the accident that a potential beneficiary lives there?
Crawford, Bridget J., Simon, Michelle S.
core   +1 more source

The Proceedings of the European Ombudsman [PDF]

, 2004
Given the severe institutional shortcomings of the European Ombudsman and the poor understanding of his duties among European citizens, the Ombudsman\u27s information strategy does not appear to have been very effective so far.
Cadeddu, Simone
core   +1 more source

Designing Redress: A Study About Grievances Against Public Bodies [PDF]

, 2012
How grievances against public bodies are resolved is important not only for the individuals concerned and the decision-makers complained about but also to the whole system of government. People need to have confidence that when things go wrong, they will
Bondy, V, Le Sueur, A
core  

Ten Years on: The Exhaustion Principle and the Practice of the Constitutional Court of Kosovo as the Final Authority for Protection of Human Rights

Open Journal for Legal Studies, 2018
Ten years after the establishment of the Constitutional Court of Kosovo, this paper aims to examine the concept of exhaustion of legal remedies in Kosovo judicial system where an individual has brought a case claiming violation of human rights guaranteed
Besfort T. Rrecaj, Bardh Bokshi
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The Dialogue of the Constitutional Court with the Ordinary Courts: The Developments in Thirty Years

Vilnius University Open Series
We discuss the interaction between the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania and the ordinary courts over three decades. First, we analyse the implementation of the right and obligation of ordinary courts to apply to the Constitutional Court.
Airė Keturakienė, Donatas Murauskas
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Constitutional Law: Limitations Imposed on Traditional Use of Doctrine of Federal Judicial Abstention [PDF]

, 1966
The Supreme Court held that federal judicial abstention may be inappropriate where violation of first amendment rights results from threatened state criminal proceedings brought under vague statutes or where bad faith prosecutions give rise to a claim ...

core   +1 more source

Constitutional adjudication in the system of separation of powers. American impacts in Hungary

, 2017
Throughout the world one can find two basic models of constitutional adjudication: the American and the Kelsenian ones. At first sight one could easily differentiate them with the mere fact that in the American model there is no separate constitutional ...
L. Csink
semanticscholar   +1 more source