Results 271 to 280 of about 63,572 (349)

Practice variation in induction of labor: A critical document analysis on the contribution of regional protocols. [PDF]

PLoS One
Zondag DC, Offerhaus PM, Keulen JKJ, van Haaren-Ten Haken TM, Nieuwenhuijze MJ.   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of melatonin as an adjuvant agent for induction of labor: The MILO trial. [PDF]

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Quach D, Mol BW, Springer J, Tully E, Higgins C, Jones M, Hennes D, Pham Y, Swarnamani K, Palmer K, Davies-Tuck M.   +10 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Correction: Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert - A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd
Beyer J, Jäger Y, Balci D, Kolb G, Weschenfelder F, Seeger S, Schlembach D, Abou-Dakn M, Schleußner E.   +8 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Amniotic Fluid Embolism in a Patient Presenting for Induction of Labor for Cholestasis of Pregnancy. [PDF]

Cureus
Parenteau EW, Block M, Higgins D.
europepmc   +1 more source

Does induction of labor without a medical indication explain the overall increase in the induction rate: an observational study before and after the ARRIVE trial. [PDF]

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Attali I, Cormier J, Goffinet F, Ray CL.
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Failed Induction of Labor Using a Contemporary Definition.

Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021
OBJECTIVE To estimate the incidence of failed induction of labor and the associated patient risk factors. METHODS We performed a case-control study from a cohort of nulliparous women who delivered between 39 and 41 weeks of gestation after an induction
T. Freret, Gregory T. Woods, K. James, A. Kaimal, M. Clapp   +4 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Induction of labor

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
Several mechanical and biochemical methods have been used to induce labor throughout modern obstetrics. We review and compare mechanical and medical methods of labor induction, along with several new uterotonic agents such as mifepristone (RU 486) and misoprostol, which can be conveniently administered orally and managed in the outpatient clinic.
A, Reichler, Y, Romem, M Y, Divon
openaire   +2 more sources

Induction of Labor: An Overview of Guidelines.

Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 2020
Importance Induction of labor (IOL) is a common obstetric intervention that stimulates the onset of labor using artificial methods. Objective The aim of this study was to summarize and compare recommendations from 4 national or international medical ...
I. Tsakiridis, A. Mamopoulos, A. Athanasiadis, T. Dagklis   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared With Expectant Management: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies

Obstetric Anesthesia Digest, 2020
meta-analysis of observational studies, 39-week labor induction among low-risk nulliparas associated reduced risks of cesarean delivery and multiple adverse perinatal This study reports on the impact of polypropylene mesh and/or an extracellular matrix ...
W. Grobman, A. Caughey
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Elective induction of labor

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1953
I T IS 0~1: opinion that the elective induction of labor has a useful place in present-day obstetrics with advantages to both patient and doctor. If the procedure is applied to the proper patient at the proper time, no serious complications should result. As Eastman1 points out in commenting on Hanley’s; paper, “It is the abuse of the procedure, or its
I, DAICHMAN, W, POMERANCE
openaire   +4 more sources