Results 281 to 290 of about 135,527 (337)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Guideline No. 432a: Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labour - General Information.

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2023
OBJECTIVE This guideline presents evidence and recommendations for cervical ripening and induction of labour. It aims to provide information to birth attendants and pregnant individuals on optimal perinatal care while avoiding unnecessary obstetrical ...
D. Robinson   +5 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Induction of labour in low-risk pregnancies before 40 weeks of gestation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2022
This systematic review of 16 randomized trials, which included 8796 pregnancies, did not demonstrate a reduction in caesarean births or perinatal morbidity from induction of labour (IoL) at 39-40 weeks for non-medical indications.
Susan Dong   +5 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Evaluating misoprostol and mechanical methods for induction of labour

BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2022
Increasingly, births around the world are started artificially using medications or other methods. This process is known as induction of labour. As it becomes more common, methods are needed to meet the different clinical needs and birth preferences of ...
A. Weeks   +5 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Five‐year trends in induction of labour in a large Australian metropolitan maternity service

Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2022
The World Health Organisation recommends that induction of labour (IOL) be performed only with a clear medical indication. Australian rates of IOL appear to be rising, with more than one‐third of women having labour induced.
C. O' Sullivan, Erin Wilson, M. Beckmann
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Online health information on induction of labour: A systematic review and quality assessment study.

European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 2022
OBJECTIVES Many women will seek information online about induction of labour. However, the quality of the available information varies greatly and there are no regulations regarding the content that is published.
L. Ewington   +4 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Induction of labour in patients with prior caesarean births or uterine surgery.

Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2021
The current evidence favours trial of labour after one caesarean in the absence of any other contraindications, recognizing that risks with both trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) and elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) birth are relatively ...
S. Agarwal, R. D’Souza, J. Dy
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Induction of labour: Experiences of care and decision-making of women and clinicians.

Women and Birth, 2020
BACKGROUND There has been a rise in induction of labour over recent decades. There is some tension in the literature in relation to when induction is warranted and when not, with variability between guidelines and practice.
Dominiek Coates   +2 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

INDUCTION OF LABOUR

Medical Journal of Australia, 1977
The only justification for adding to the extensive literature on induction of labour is to bring together relatively inaccessible but relevant data for the general reader. Some of these data refer to current practice, and some to patients' experiences. The conflicting value systems of some doctors and some patients are also discussed.
openaire   +4 more sources

Surgical Induction of Labour

Asia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
SummarySix hundred and forty‐one patients who underwent induced labour over a 12 month period were analysed. The ethnic group distribution was similar to that in the obstetric population. 54.6% of these were primiparous patients. The common indications of induced labour were hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, static weight and post‐term pregnancy. The
P C, Wong, S S, Ratnam
openaire   +2 more sources

Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Term PROM: A Systematic Review.

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2020
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of oral misoprostol for induction of labour (IOL) in the context of term pre-labour rupture of membranes (TPROM), and to assess pregnancy outcomes following the administration of oral misoprostol.
L. Padayachee   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy