Results 191 to 200 of about 2,754 (233)
Against the Doctrine of Infallibility [PDF]
Philosophical Quarterly, 2021 According to the doctrine of infallibility, one is permitted to believe p if one knows that necessarily, one would be right if one believed that p. This plausible principle—made famous in Descartes’ cogito—is false. There are some self-fulfilling, higher-
Christopher Willard-Kyle
exaly +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Are there Infallible Expalanations?
Tulane Studies in Philosophy, 1960Toward the end of the preface to his Philosophie des Rechts, Hegel observes that “the owl of Minerva takes flight only with the gathering of dusk”.1 He says this in connection with his view that philosphy always comesn on the scene after the processes with which it is concerned are completed.
openaire +1 more source
Ockham's Infallibility and Ryan's Infallibility
Franciscan Studies, 1986Professor Ryan very courteously sent me his paper in advance so that I could make this brief response. Fm afraid we may be at the point of just reiterating past arguments in a mood of mutual incomprehension. But I will try again for a few minutes to clarify my position. Let me begin with something we can agree on.
openaire +1 more source
Is the Pathologist Infallible?
Archives of Internal Medicine, 1960Without any doubt microscopic examination of sections of tissue, when it is carried out by a pathologist who has had superior training and long experience, is a most valuable method of determining the essential character of an inflammatory process or of identifying different kinds of benign or malignant tumors.
openaire +3 more sources
2021
This paper discusses a new paradox, the paradox of infallibility. Let us define infallibility in the following way: (Def I) t is infallible if and only if (iff) everything t believes is true, where t is any term. (Def I) entails the following proposition: (I) It is necessary that for every individual x, x is infallible iff every proposition x believes ...
openaire +1 more source
This paper discusses a new paradox, the paradox of infallibility. Let us define infallibility in the following way: (Def I) t is infallible if and only if (iff) everything t believes is true, where t is any term. (Def I) entails the following proposition: (I) It is necessary that for every individual x, x is infallible iff every proposition x believes ...
openaire +1 more source