Results 181 to 190 of about 231 (226)

Inferentialism

2023
The entry presents the inferentialist account of legal interpretation and meaning.
Canale, Damiano, Tuzet, Giovanni
openaire   +2 more sources

Inferentializing Semantics

Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2010
This paper is a contribution to ``inferentialism, a doctrine that the meaning of an expression is generally in its inferential role''. In order to sort out problems in inferentialism, the author offers a ``very general framework for measuring inferentializability of semantic systems''.
openaire   +2 more sources

Inferential Intensionality

Studia Logica, 2004
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire   +2 more sources

Inferential Conditionals and Evidentiality

Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2013
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Karolina Krzyzanowska, Sylvia Wenmackers, Igor Douven   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Inferential and non‐inferential tests

Educational Research, 1984
Summary This article follows up the debate on inferential statistics in Volumes 19 and 20 of Educational Research. It is particularly addressed to the researcher working with a non‐random sample, perhaps in a single institution. Attention is drawn to the suitability of randomization tests in such a situation.
openaire   +1 more source

Inferential confusion in obsessive–compulsive disorder: the inferential confusion questionnaire

Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2005
The current article represents the further validation of the construct of inferential confusion amongst clinical samples. Inferential confusion is proposed to be a meta-cognitive confusion particularly relevant to obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) that leads a person to confuse an imagined possibility with an actual probability.
Aardema, F., O'Connor, K., Emmelkamp, P.M.G., Marchand, A., Todorov, A.   +4 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Duality and Inferential Semantics [PDF]

Axiomathes, 2015
It is well known that classical inferentialist semantics runs into problems regarding abnormal valuations [3, 6, 10]. It is equally well known that the issues can be resolved if we construct the inference relation in a multiple-conclusion sequent calculus.
openaire   +2 more sources

TESTIMONIAL JUSTIFICATION: INFERENTIAL OR NON-INFERENTIAL?

The Philosophical Quarterly, 2006
Anti-reductionists hold that beliefs based upon comprehension (of both force and content) of tellings are non-inferentially justified. For reductionists, on the other hand, comprehension as such is not in itself a warrant for belief: beliefs based on it are justified only if inferentially supported by other beliefs.
openaire   +1 more source

Inferential explanations in biology

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 2013
Among philosophers of science, there is now a widespread agreement that the DN model of explanation is poorly equipped to account for explanations in biology. Rather than identifying laws, so the consensus goes, researchers explain biological capacities by constructing a model of the underlying mechanism.
Raoul, Gervais, Erik, Weber
openaire   +2 more sources

Inferential control applications

Automatica, 1985
In high-order, long-dead-time processes, inferential control systems will generally outperform conventional feedback control systems. To implement inferential control the user must know how to - tune the inferential controller on line, - avoid control degradation due to saturation of the control effort, - smooth manual-automatic switching, - design a ...
J. R. Parrish, C. B. Brosilow
openaire   +2 more sources