Results 11 to 20 of about 231 (226)
In this conversation, American philosopher Robert Brandom talks about the historical background of his inferentialism, reconstructing the influence of his teachers Wilfrid Sellars and Richard Rorty.
Robert B. Brandom, Ivan Ivashchenko
doaj +1 more source
Říká logicismus něco, co se říkat nemá?
Does Logicism Say Something That Should Not Be Said? The objective of this paper is to analyze the broader significance of Frege’s logicist project against the background of Wittgenstein’s philosophy from both Tractatus and Philosophical Investigations ...
Vojtěch Kolman
doaj +1 more source
Frege introduced the notion of pragmatic force as what distinguishes statements from questions. This distinction was elaborated by Wittgenstein in his later works, and systematised as an account of different kinds of speech acts in formal dialogue theory
Mackenzie Jim
doaj +1 more source
Assertion, Justificatory Commitment, and Trust
This paper discusses the commitment account of assertion (CAA), according to which two necessary conditions for asserting that p are the speaker's undertaking a commitment to justify her assertion in the face of challenges and the speaker's licensing the
Fernando Rudy Hiller
doaj +1 more source
Causation: Many Words, One Thing?
How many notions of cause are there? The causality literature is witnessing a flourishing of pluralist positions. Here I focus on a recent debate on whether interpreting causality in terms of inferential relations commits one to semantic pluralism (Reiss,
Lorenzo Casini
doaj +1 more source
Quasi-Occasionalistic Causation in the Philosophy of René Descartes [PDF]
Introduction The discussion of “self-knowledge” as a philosophical issue begins with an intuition. This intuition is based on the fact that our knowledge of our mental states or our knowledge in relation to statements like: “I know that I am happy,” is a
Hasan Ahmadizade
doaj +1 more source
Inferential and Non‐Inferential Reasoning [PDF]
It is sometimes suggested that there are two kinds of reasoning: inferential reasoning and non‐inferential reasoning. However, it is not entirely clear what the difference between these two kinds of reasoning is. In this paper, I try to answer the question what this difference is.
openaire +1 more source
The Poet Sings: “Resonance” in Paul Valéry’s Poietics
This paper analyses Paul Valéry’s theories relating to his stated goal of poetic production: the attainment of “resonance” and a “singing-state”. My intention is to defend Valéry’s theory as a valid and consistent model of the creative process in poetry.
Martin Parker Dixon
doaj +1 more source
Intuition as a Capacity for a Priori Knowledge [PDF]
This article lays the groundwork for a defense of rational intuitions by first arguing against a prevalent view according to which intuition is a distinctive psychological state, an “intellectual seeming” that p, that then constitutes evidence that p. An
Henry W. Pickford
doaj +1 more source
Self Knowledge and its Relationship with Rationality; Defending Richard Moran's Transparency Theory [PDF]
Introduction The discussion of “self-knowledge” as a philosophical issue begins with an intuition. This intuition is based on the fact that our knowledge of our mental states or our knowledge in relation to statements like: “I know that I am happy,” is a
Zahra Sarkarpour
doaj +1 more source

