Results 71 to 80 of about 946,189 (223)
Risk Factors for Posterior Cage Migration after Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery [PDF]
Study DesignA retrospective clinical case series.PurposeTo determine the strength of association between cage retropulsion and its related factors.Overview of LiteratureLumbar interbody fusion with cage can obtain a firm union and can restore the disc ...
Dong-Yeong Lee +4 more
doaj +1 more source
In 172 patients aged ≥ 75 years undergoing TLIF, mini‐open TLIF (MO‐TLIF) reduced perioperative burden (shorter operative time, less blood loss, lower POD3 CK) and enabled faster early pain/function recovery versus open TLIF, while 3–6 month PROMs and 12‐month fusion and satisfaction were comparable.
Zhendong Huang +6 more
wiley +1 more source
Study Design Systematic Literature Review Objective Perform a systematic review evaluating postoperative fusion rates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using structural allograft vs various interbody devices augmented with different ...
Amit Jain MD, MBA +11 more
doaj +1 more source
Minimally Invasive Far Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Cohort Study
Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Objectives: To assess rate and degree of interbody bone fusion and evolution in Oswestry Disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) of pain after minimally invasive far lateral lumbar interbody fusion ...
Carlo Doria MD, PhD +3 more
doaj +1 more source
In our study, we found that the GAP score could effectively predict the risk of mechanical complications after long‐segment fixation surgery in geriatric ADS patients. ABSTRACT Objectives The predictive value of the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score in the Chinese geriatric population, which has unique demographic and degenerative ...
Xiangyao Sun +6 more
wiley +1 more source
Comparison of rigid and semi-rigid instrumentation under acute load on vertebrae treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: An experimental study [PDF]
Rigid and semi-rigid fixations are investigated several times in order to compare their biomechanical stability. Interbody fusion techniques are also preferable for maintaining the sagittal balance by protecting the disk height.
İlhan Yılmaz +11 more
core +1 more source
This retrospective comparative study demonstrates that Arthroscopic‐Assisted Uni‐portal Spinal Surgery (AUSS/UNSES) for double‐segment lumbar stenosis achieves equivalent 12‐month clinical outcomes to Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE), while offering significant perioperative advantages including shorter operative time, reduced drainage and ...
Zhide Liu +5 more
wiley +1 more source
Prone Position Lateral Interbody Fusion-A Narrative Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lateral access lumbar interbody fusion is an increasingly popular procedure that allows for anterior column support through discectomy, endplate preparation, and interbody insertion.
Patel, Harshadkumar +2 more
core +1 more source
Axial lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year single-center experience
Dick J Zeilstra,1 Larry E Miller,2,3 Jon E Block3 1Bergman Clinics, Naarden and NedSpine, Ede, The Netherlands; 2Miller Scientific Consulting, Inc, Arden, NC, USA; 3The Jon Block Group, San Francisco, CA, USA Introduction: The aim of this study is to ...
Miller LE, Block JE, Zeilstra DJ
core
EVALUATION OF INTERBODY FUSION TWO YEARS AFTER LLIF PROCEDURE
Objectives The LLIF technique, extreme lateral interbody fusion, reaches the disc laterally through the psoas muscle, offering adequate access to the disc space with the added benefit of preventing iatrogenic injury to abdominal vascular structures ...
FÁBIO ROSA +5 more
doaj +1 more source

