Results 251 to 260 of about 4,021,840 (269)

Clinicopathological Study of the Idiopathic Macular Hole: Comparison of Epiretinal Membrane Peeling and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling

Ophthalmologica, 2003
The aim of this study was to identify the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) harvested during macular hole surgery under light microscopy and electron microscopy and to evaluate the difference in specimen loss rate with and without the aid of indocyanine green (ICG) staining.
Hsi-Kung, Kuo, Jui-Wei, Lin, Ming-Lun, Kao, Chi-Chang, Liu   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling

Ophthalmology, 2000
To compare results of surgery for idiopathic macular hole with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in a series of consecutive patients over a 5-year period.A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial with concurrent control group.Forty-four eyes with macular holes of less than or equal to 6 months duration without ILM peeling ...
openaire   +2 more sources

VITRECTOMY WITH INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING AND AIR TAMPONADE FOR MYOPIC FOVEOSCHISIS

Retina, 2019
Purpose: To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes of 23-gauge or 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and air tamponade for the treatment of myopic foveoschisis. Methods: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series.
Rizzo S., Giansanti F., Finocchio L., Caporossi T., Barca F., Bacherini D., Cocci G., Vannucchi M., Tartaro R., Virgili G.   +9 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Internal limiting membrane peeling

Ophthalmology, 2004
Christos Haritoglou, Arnd Gandorfer, Anselm Kampik   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING MICROSERRATED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FORCEPS FOR INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING

Retina
Purpose: To evaluate anatomic outcomes and surgeon response following the use of microserrated (Sharkskin, Alcon, Forth Worth, TX) internal limiting membrane (ILM) forceps compared with conventional (Grieshaber; Alcon) ILM forceps for peeling of the ILM.
Matthew R. Starr, John C. Hinkle, Luv G. Patel, Michael J. Ammar, Rebecca R. Soares, Samir N. Patel, Michael N. Cohen, Jason Hsu, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Allen C. Ho, Carl D. Regillo, Omesh P. Gupta   +11 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Internal limiting membrane peeling without vitrectomy for laser-induced macular holes in two children

European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022
Nan Chen
exaly  

Broad internal limiting membrane peeling with adjunctive plasma–thrombin for repair of large macular holes: A retrospective case series

European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021
Kyle A Bolo, Stanley Chang
exaly  

Fovea-Sparing versus Standard Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Myopic Traction Maculopathy: A Study of 102 Consecutive Cases

Ophthalmology Retina, 2020
Shigeru Sato, Nagakazu Matsumura, Kohji Nishida   +2 more
exaly  

Combined fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with internal limiting membrane flap technique for progressive myopic traction maculopathy

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2021
Chung-May Yang
exaly  

Does Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Size Matter?

Journal of Vitreoretinal Diseases, 2017
David H W Steel, Yunzi Chen, Peter J Avery   +2 more
exaly