Results 201 to 210 of about 34,888 (265)

Theory and Practice of Treaty Interpretation*

Netherlands International Law Review, 1980
Treaty interpretation is a matter of legal methodology, a comprehensive notion embracing a great variety of subjects. In the Diagram published together with this study, the present writer gives his own view of legal methodology as applied to international law.
openaire   +1 more source

Situations and Interpretations: Explorations in Interpretive Practice

Anthropological Quarterly, 2001
Interpretation has long been a central problem for linguistic and cultural analysis. Given that conceptual categories never completely "fit" the messy situations of everyday life, how do people make sense out of situations in ways that make sense to others? How do they articulate the meanings they derive from the streams of experience around them? Much
William Beeman, Mark Allen Peterson
openaire   +1 more source

Working with interpreters: practical advice for use of an interpreter in healthcare

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 2013
The aim of this descriptive commentary is to improve communication in healthcare when an interpreter is used by providing practical advice to healthcare staff when they consider using interpreters. This descriptive commentary considered the issues of preparation and implementation of interpretation sessions to reveal the complexities and dilemmas of an
Emina, Hadziabdic, Katarina, Hjelm
openaire   +2 more sources

Interpreting Practice

Idealistic Studies, 2008
This paper explores Dilthey's radical transformation of epistemology and the human sciences through his projects of a critique of historically embodied reason and his hermeneutics of historically mediated life. Answering criticisms that Dilthey overly depends on epistemology, I show how for Dilthey neither philosophy nor the human sciences should be ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Practical Reason and Statutory Interpretation

Law and Philosophy, 1993
Again, the point about the impossibility of blending the normative and the descriptive is a point about ontology, not epistemology. With respect to epistemology, such blending is quite plausible. For example, if statutes were deemed ontologically to consist of, say, the intentions of the legislators, suitably described and aggregated, the best evidence
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy