Results 101 to 110 of about 130 (122)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2007
The proper reasoning is an essential part of court judgments, so also the ECHR. However, when explaining factual findings, judges basically have on disposal two strategies - one based on the conviction (fr. - intime conviction), and one based on the burden of proof rules. The lecture discusses the consequences of both strategies.
openaire
The proper reasoning is an essential part of court judgments, so also the ECHR. However, when explaining factual findings, judges basically have on disposal two strategies - one based on the conviction (fr. - intime conviction), and one based on the burden of proof rules. The lecture discusses the consequences of both strategies.
openaire
L’intime conviction et les formes de croyance : de l’expérience au regard philosophique
Annales Medico-Psychologiques, 2015Michel De Boucaud
exaly
L’intime conviction dans le procès pénal : approche médico-psychologique
Annales Medico-Psychologiques, 2015Michel Benezech
exaly
L’intime conviction en droit français et dans la tradition juridique anglo-saxonne
Annales Medico-Psychologiques, 2015exaly