Results 131 to 140 of about 49,870 (266)

Preliminary Evaluation of a Hybrid Scan Transfer Workflow for Complex Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitations. [PDF]

Dent J (Basel)
Scrascia R, Bizzoca ME, Locurcio L, Catalano I, Antonucci F, Barone A, Cataneo E, Cervino G.   +7 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Monolithic Zirconia Versus Porcelain‐Fused‐to‐Metal Implant‐Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region: 3‐Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Clinical Oral Implants Research, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the clinical, biological, and technical outcomes of posterior three‐unit implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (iFDPs) fabricated from monolithic zirconia (MonoZR) or porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal (PFM). Materials and Methods In this prospective randomized controlled trial, partially edentulous patients requiring a ...
Aspasia Pachiou, Raphael Singh, Ronald E. Jung, Marc Balmer, Goran I. Benic, Alexis Ioannidis   +5 more
wiley   +1 more source

Painless Buccal Abscess With Intraoral Fistula in an Older Woman. [PDF]

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open
Yamamoto K, Aoki Y, Harada H, Takahashi K, Yamano S, Hayakawa K, Tasaki O.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Segmented Intraoral Scanning With a Palatal Marker for Complete‐Arch Digital Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Clinical Oral Implants Research, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Objectives To compare four complete‐arch implant impression workflows—segmented right/left IOS merged via a palatal marker (IOS‐LEGO‐Seg), continuous full‐arch IOS with a palatal marker (IOS‐LEGO‐Full), continuous full‐arch IOS without a palatal marker (IOS‐Full), and a conventional open‐tray PVS impression followed by cast fabrication and ...
Reo Ikumi, Takahiro Murakami, Luís Azevedo, João Pitta, Duygu Karasan, Irena Sailer   +5 more
wiley   +1 more source

Influencing viable oral bacteria in the patient's oral cavity and on the dentist's mask. [PDF]

BMC Oral Health
Gund MP, Naim J, Wittig J, Lang J, Hannig M, Gärtner B, Halfmann A, Boros G, Rupf S.   +8 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Screw‐Retained Monolithic Zirconia Implant Crowns on Standardized Titanium Base Versus Customized Titanium Abutments– 3‐Years Data

Clinical Oral Implants Research, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Objectives To assess 3‐year interim results of implant‐supported monolithic zirconia single crowns on standardized titanium base vs. customized titanium abutments. Material and Methods Patients in need of posterior implant were recruited.
Jenni Hjerppe, Stephanie Wenk, Shunsuke Fukuba, Sven Mühlemann, Ronald E. Jung, Daniel S. Thoma   +5 more
wiley   +1 more source

Comparative Evaluation of Shade Selection Reliability: Visual Assessment, Intraoral Scanning, and Photographic Techniques. [PDF]

Int J Dent
Atri F, Rahmani F, Memarian M, Pirooz P.
europepmc   +1 more source

Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses Supported by Teeth or Implants in the Posterior Region—A Long‐Term Retrospective Multicenter Study

Clinical Oral Implants Research, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Background Few long‐term studies compare tooth‐ and implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) in the posterior region. Objectives To compare the 5‐ and 10‐year survival and complication outcomes of tooth‐ and implant‐supported FDPs and to assess patient‐reported effects. Material and Methods This retrospective multicenter clinical study
Zahra Athab Abduljabbar, Lars Hjalmarsson, Victoria Franke Stenport, Jir Barzangi, Anders Magnuson, Alf Eliasson   +5 more
wiley   +1 more source

Digital workflow with intraoral scanning and CAD/CAM PMMA crowns in a non-cooperative pediatric patient with early childhood caries: a case report. [PDF]

Front Oral Health
Reytor-González C, Guachamin-Catota V, Carrillo Zúñiga AH, González Hidalgo MA, Román-Galeano NM, Simancas-Racines D.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Patch Test Reactions to Dental Materials: A Retrospective Single‐Centre Study

Contact Dermatitis, EarlyView.
In this retrospective single‐centre study of 439 adults referred for suspected delayed‐type hypersensitivity to dental materials, 50.1% had at least one positive patch test reaction, most often to metals. Nickel (23.0%) and palladium (16.6%) pre‐dominated, whilst methacrylate positivity was uncommon (6.2%) and not fully captured by HEMA alone.
Mojca Bizjak‐Suran, Manca Marčun, Mitja Košnik, Dejan Dinevski   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source