Results 41 to 50 of about 61,659 (287)

Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision

open access: yesDentistry Journal, 2020
The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface topography and the precision measurements of different intraoral and extraoral digital scanners. A reference model of a maxillary arch with four implant analogs was prepared and scanned by three intraoral
Sang J. Lee   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Characteristics of intraoral scanners.

open access: yes, 2019
Characteristics of intraoral scanners.
Ryan Jin-Young Kim (7886849)   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Intraoral Scanners

open access: yesClinical Dentistry
Intraoral scanners (IOS) have revolutionized the field of dentistry by providing a noninvasive and efficient means of capturing direct optical impressions of the oral cavity. This article presents an overview of the applications, advantages, and challenges associated with the adoption of intraoral scanners in dental practice.
Amina Parveen   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners

open access: yes, 2022
an Overview of how intraoral scanners work, their advantages and disadvantages compared to traditional impression techniques. compartive evaluation of the accuracy of different mainstream intraoral scanners regarding partial and complete arch scanning ...
Aldbai, Jissika
core  

Precision of maxillo-mandibular registration with intraoral scanners in vitro [PDF]

open access: yes, 2020
Purpose: To compare the precision of maxillo-mandibular registration and resulting full arch occlusion produced by three intraoral scanners in vitro. Methods: Six dental models (groups A–F) were scanned five times with intraoral scanners (CEREC, TRIOS,
Gintaute, A   +11 more
core   +3 more sources

Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An in vitro study

open access: yesThe Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2022
Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of conventional implant impressions with digital impression techniques made using two different intraoral scanners. Setting and Design: In-Vitro study. Material and Methods: A scan of master cast
Mohsin Shaikh   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Intraoral scanners used in clinical dental practices.

open access: yes, 2016
Intraoral scanners used in clinical dental practices.
Kyung-Jin Suh (2837978)   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Validation of Digital Impressions’ Accuracy Obtained Using Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review

open access: yes, 2023
Background: At present, the evidence regarding digital impressions’ accuracy recorded by using digital scanners is lacking. This systematic review aimed to evaluate whether the type of scanning (intraoral/extraoral) affects the Accuracy of Digital ...
Omkar Shetty   +8 more
core   +1 more source

Assesment of different Intraoral Scanners in Intracoronal Preparations: A Systematic Review.

open access: yes, 2023
With the advent of technology there are new Intraoral scanners continuously introduced into the market for digital impressions. There are several scanners proposed for intracoronal preparations and it is timely to verify that these scanners have been ...
Tejasri K   +6 more
core   +1 more source

Root‐Inspired Microneedle Patch With Interlocked Rigid‐Soft Architecture for High Tissue‐Adaptiveness

open access: yesAdvanced Science, EarlyView.
A root‐inspired microneedle array patch uses lattice‐based mechanical interlocking to unite rigid microneedles with a flexible substrate. The interlocked rigid–soft architecture improves interfacial bonding, supports stable adhesion on curved and wet tissues under dynamic motion, and provides a versatile platform for robust biointerfacing and future ...
Jongchan Lee   +9 more
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy