Results 211 to 220 of about 1,750,321 (260)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
THE INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1978This presentation brings into perspective the most recent information on intrauterine contraceptive devices. A comprehensive review of the literature is presented in a manner meaningful to the clinician. The advantages and disadvantages of this method of contraception, the problems that arise and the recommended methods of management are discussed.
B N, Barwin, S, Tuttle, E E, Jolly
openaire +2 more sources
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
Approximately 60 million women use the intrauterine device (IUD) worldwide; however, owing primarily to nonmedical reasons, the IUD is far less popular in the United States. Although the contraceptive mechanism of action is unknown, it appears that spermicidal activity may be important.
openaire +2 more sources
Approximately 60 million women use the intrauterine device (IUD) worldwide; however, owing primarily to nonmedical reasons, the IUD is far less popular in the United States. Although the contraceptive mechanism of action is unknown, it appears that spermicidal activity may be important.
openaire +2 more sources
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2002
The aim of this chapter is to review the worldwide use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) for contraception and the long-term contraceptive efficacy and safety of copper-bearing IUDs. The TCu380A and Multiload Cu375 have a very low failure rate (0.2-0.5%) over 10 years.
openaire +2 more sources
The aim of this chapter is to review the worldwide use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) for contraception and the long-term contraceptive efficacy and safety of copper-bearing IUDs. The TCu380A and Multiload Cu375 have a very low failure rate (0.2-0.5%) over 10 years.
openaire +2 more sources
The intrauterine device and the intrauterine system
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2014Intrauterine contraception is used by about 100 million women worldwide, making it the most popular form of fertility regulation. In UK community contraception clinics, however, long-acting reversible contraception has increased to 28% of users, and intrauterine contraception accounts for only 8% of methods used by women accessing these services ...
openaire +2 more sources
Management of missing intrauterine device strings and migrated intrauterine devices
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2023Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to review the recent literature with respect to the management of missing intrauterine device (IUD) strings. As IUD use has increased over time, it is important to review management options for this uncommon but possible complication.
Stephanie I, Amaya, Paul D, Blumenthal
openaire +2 more sources
The Incarcerated Intrauterine Device
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1978Summary: Complete embedding or incarceration of the IUD is likely to cause difficulty at removal. Attempts at vaginal removal with ‘heavy’ instrumentation are hazardous and should be abandoned in favour of an abdominal approach. A trial demonstrating the superiority of the latter approach is described.
openaire +2 more sources
The GyneFix Intrauterine Device
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2006link_to_subscribed_fulltext
openaire +3 more sources
Contraception with Intrauterine Devices
BioScience, 1973A review of the history of contraception with intrauterine devices characteristics of present devices and directions of current research is presented. The serious need for population control is not yet being met by todays inconvenient ineffective or unsafe methods. Intrauterine devices have been best for international family planning programs because
openaire +2 more sources
Actinomyces and Intrauterine Devices
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1982To the Editor.— It was with interest that we read the recent editorial on Actinomyces in vaginal smears (1982; 247:1175), suggesting that women who had Actinomyces -positive smears should use a contraceptive method other than the intrauterine device (IUD). This report was publicized in the British lay press.
H, Duguid +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Pioneers of the intrauterine device
The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 1997The history of the intrauterine device is remarkably short and its survival has been jeopardized several times from the beginning when Gräfenberg introduced the intrauterine ring in 1928, and later when product liability claims in the USA forced companies to withdraw the IUD from the market.
openaire +2 more sources