Results 1 to 10 of about 26,213 (204)

On locally compact semitopological O-bisimple inverse ω-semigroups

open access: yesTopological Algebra and its Applications, 2018
We describe the structure of Hausdorff locally compact semitopological O-bisimple inverse ω- semigroups with compact maximal subgroups. In particular, we show that a Hausdorff locally compact semitopological O-bisimple inverse ω-semigroup with a compact ...
Gutik Oleg
doaj   +3 more sources

Semigroup closures of finite rank symmetric inverse semigroups

open access: yesSemigroup Forum, 2008
We introduce the notion of semigroup with a tight ideal series and investigate their closures in semitopological semigroups, particularly inverse semigroups with continuous inversion.
Oleg V Gutik   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

(b, c)-inverse, inverse along an element, and the Schützenberger category of a semigroup [PDF]

open access: yesCategories and General Algebraic Structures with Applications, 2021
We prove that the (b, c)-inverse and the inverse along an element in a semigroup are actually genuine inverse when considered as morphisms in the Schützenberger category of a semigroup. Applications to the Reverse Order Law are given.
Xavier MARY
doaj   +1 more source

Finite coverings of semigroups and related structures [PDF]

open access: yesInternational Journal of Group Theory, 2023
For a semigroup $S$, the covering number of $S$ with respect to semigroups, $\sigma_s(S)$, is the minimum number of proper subsemigroups of $S$ whose union is $S$.
Casey Donoven, Luise-Charlotte Kappe
doaj   +1 more source

Pettis property for Polish inverse semigroups

open access: yesApplied General Topology, 2023
We study a property about Polish inverse semigroups similar to the classical theorem of Pettis about Polish groups. In contrast to what happens with Polish groups, not every Polish inverse semigroup have the Pettis property.
Karen Arana   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Quantum inverse semigroups

open access: yesJournal of Noncommutative Geometry, 2023
In this work, the notion of a quantum inverse semigroup is introduced as a linearized generalization of inverse semigroups. Beyond the algebra of an inverse semigroup, which is the natural example of a quantum inverse semigroup, several other examples of this new structure are presented in different contexts; those are related to Hopf algebras, weak ...
Marcelo Muniz Alves   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Expansions of inverse semigroups [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of the Australian Mathematical Society, 2006
AbstractWe construct the freest idempotent-pure expansion of an inverse semigroup, generalizing an expansion of Margolis and Meakin for the group case. We also generalize the Birget-Rhodes prefix expansion to inverse semigroups with an application to partial actions of inverse semigroups.
Lawson, Mark V.   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Coverages on inverse semigroups [PDF]

open access: yesSemigroup Forum, 2020
First we give a definition of a coverage on a inverse semigroup that is weaker than the one gave by a Lawson and Lenz and that generalizes the definition of a coverage on a semilattice given by Johnstone. Given such a coverage, we prove that there exists a pseudogroup that is universal in the sense that it transforms cover-to-join idempotent-pure maps ...
openaire   +3 more sources

A characterization of a ∼ admissible congruence on a weakly type B semigroup

open access: yesOpen Mathematics, 2023
In this article, the notions of ∼ \sim admissible congruences and ∼ \sim normal congruences on a weakly type B semigroup are characterized and the relationship between ∼ \sim admissible congruences and ∼ \sim normal congruences is investigated.
Li Chunhua   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Amalgamating inverse semigroups over ample semigroups [PDF]

open access: yesProceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences
We consider semigroup amalgams (S; T1, T2) in which T1 and T2 are inverse semigroups and S is a non-inverse semigroup. They are known to be non-embeddable if T1 and T2 are both groups (Clifford semigroups), but S is not such. We prove that (S; T1, T2) is
Nasir Sohail
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy