Results 211 to 220 of about 25,672 (245)
Asymmetries in Anticyclone Catalyze Submesoscale Motions
Abstract Oceanic mesoscale eddies are often asymmetric, exhibiting horizontal deformation and vertical tilt, yet the implications of these structural asymmetries for finer‐scale dynamics remain poorly understood. Based on a series of high‐resolution numerical experiments, we found that asymmetric anticyclones act as potent catalysts for submesoscale ...
Xianliang Wu, Hong Li, Fanghua Xu
wiley +1 more source
Touching the classical scaling in penetrative convection. [PDF]
Ouyang Z, Wang Q, Li K, Wen B, Ding Z.
europepmc +1 more source
Abstract The accuracy of height‐resolved dust microphysical retrieval from LiDARs has been greatly improved by the recently developed BOREAL (Basic algOrithm for REtrieval of Aerosol with LiDAR) algorithm which describes non‐spherical dust particles with the Irregular‐Hexahedral (IH) model and inverts 3β (backscattering at 355, 532, and 1,064 nm) + 2α (
Yuyang Chang +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Nilpotent symmetric Jacobian matrices and the Jacobian conjecture
openaire +1 more source
ABSTRACT In this article, we propose a novel numerical framework for the non‐isothermal Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes two‐phase flow system, which couples the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, the Cahn–Hilliard phase‐field equation, and the heat transport equation to capture temperature‐dependent two‐phase flow dynamics.
Guang‐An Zou +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Pedunculopontine-thalamic cholinergic projections in rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder. [PDF]
Schumacher J +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
2004
In this chapter, we address the most famous of the problems about polynomial mappings: Problem 5.0.1 (the Jacobian conjecture). If for n polynomials p1, ... , p n ∈ K[x1, ... , x n ], the corresponding Jacobian matrix is invertible, then K[p1, ... , p n ] = K[x1, ... , x n ].
Alexander A. Mikhalev +2 more
openaire +1 more source
In this chapter, we address the most famous of the problems about polynomial mappings: Problem 5.0.1 (the Jacobian conjecture). If for n polynomials p1, ... , p n ∈ K[x1, ... , x n ], the corresponding Jacobian matrix is invertible, then K[p1, ... , p n ] = K[x1, ... , x n ].
Alexander A. Mikhalev +2 more
openaire +1 more source
2000
As the reader certainly has noticed by now, the Jacobian Conjecture has been studied extensively and various partial results have been obtained. This chapter will not be a collection of all these results. Instead it will describe several new ways to attack the conjecture.
openaire +2 more sources
As the reader certainly has noticed by now, the Jacobian Conjecture has been studied extensively and various partial results have been obtained. This chapter will not be a collection of all these results. Instead it will describe several new ways to attack the conjecture.
openaire +2 more sources
A case of the Jacobian Conjecture
Acta Mathematica Sinica, 1988Let \(F_ 1,...,F_ n\in {\mathbb{C}}[X_ 1,...,X_ n]\) be n polynomials, and let \(F=(F_ 1,...,F_ n):\quad {\mathbb{C}}^ n\to {\mathbb{C}}^ n\) be the corresponding polynomial transformation. If F has a polynomial inverse, then \(\det (\partial F_ i/\partial X_ j)\) is a nonzero constant.
openaire +2 more sources

