Results 111 to 120 of about 787 (144)

Long-term data reveal fitness costs of anthropogenic prey depletion for a subordinate competitor, the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). [PDF]

Ecol Evol
Reyes de Merkle J, Creel S, Becker MS, Goodheart B, Mweetwa T, Mwape H, Dröge E, Simpamba T.   +7 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Field experiments on the effects of fire on parasite transmission to amphibian hosts. [PDF]

Ecology
Ortega N, Shepack A, Price W, Campbell T, Holzwart KR, Johnson SA, Rohr JR.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Relationship between wintering site and survival in a migratory waterbird using different migration routes. [PDF]

Oecologia
Ferreira HRS, Champagnon J, Alves JA, Lok T.   +3 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Effects of ophidiomycosis on movement, survival, and reproduction of eastern foxsnakes (Pantherophis vulpinus). [PDF]

Sci Rep
Dillon RM, Paterson JE, Manorome P, Ritchie K, Shirose L, Slavik E, Davy CM.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Continuous, individual, time-dependent covariates in the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model

, 2003
openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

The Jolly–Seber Model with Tag Loss

Biometrics, 2006
Summary Tag loss in mark‐recapture experiments is a violation of one of the Jolly–Seber model assumptions. It causes bias in parameter estimates and has only been dealt with in an ad hoc manner. We develop methodology to estimate tag retention and abundance in double‐tagging mark‐recapture experiments.
Cowen, Laura, Schwarz, Carl J.
openaire   +3 more sources

Open Capture–Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: II. Jolly–Seber Model

Biometrics, 2009
Summary Estimation of abundance is important in both open and closed population capture–recapture analysis, but unmodeled heterogeneity of capture probability leads to negative bias in abundance estimates. This article defines and develops a suite of open population capture–recapture models using finite mixtures to model heterogeneity of capture and ...
Pledger, Shirley, Pollock, Kenneth H., Norris, James L.   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Open Capture‐Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: I. Cormack‐Jolly‐Seber Model

Biometrics, 2003
Summary.  In open population capture‐recapture studies, it is usually assumed that similar animals (e.g., of the same sex and age group) have similar survival rates and capture probabilities. These assumptions are generally perceived to be an oversimplification, and they can lead to incorrect model selection and biased parameter estimates. Allowing for
Pledger, Shirley, Pollock, Kenneth H., Norris, James L.   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Cormack–Jolly–Seber model with environmental covariates: A P‐spline approach

Biometrical Journal, 2012
In capture–recapture models, survival and capture probabilities can be modelled as functions of time‐varying covariates, such as temperature or rainfall. The Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) model allows for flexible modelling of these covariates; however, the functional relationship may not be linear.
Stoklosa, Jakub, Huggins, Richard M.
openaire   +3 more sources

Objective prior distributions for Jolly‐Seber models of zero‐augmented data

Biometrics, 2020
AbstractStatistical models of capture‐recapture data that are used to estimate the dynamics of a population are known collectively as Jolly‐Seber (JS) models. State‐space versions of these models have been developed for the analysis of zero‐augmented data that include the capture histories of the observed individuals and an arbitrarily large number of ...
openaire   +3 more sources