Jolly-seber - Open Access .click

Biometrics, 2006
Summary Tag loss in mark‐recapture experiments is a violation of one of the Jolly–Seber model assumptions. It causes bias in parameter estimates and has only been dealt with in an ad hoc manner. We develop methodology to estimate tag retention and abundance in double‐tagging mark‐recapture experiments.
Cowen, Laura, Schwarz, Carl J.
exaly +4 more sources

The Jolly-seber model: More than just abundance

Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2001
The Jolly-Seber model provides estimates of abundance, survival, and capture rates from capture-recapture experiments. This article will describe recent extensions to the following cases: (a) multiple-cohort studies where recruitment rates are compared among cohorts, (b) age-specific breeding proportions, and (c) population growth rates.
exaly +2 more sources

Open Capture‐Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: I. Cormack‐Jolly‐Seber Model

Biometrics, 2003
Summary. In open population capture‐recapture studies, it is usually assumed that similar animals (e.g., of the same sex and age group) have similar survival rates and capture probabilities. These assumptions are generally perceived to be an oversimplification, and they can lead to incorrect model selection and biased parameter estimates. Allowing for
Pledger, Shirley, Pollock, Kenneth H., Norris, James L. +2 more
exaly +3 more sources

mark-recapture
survival
zoology

population size
capture–recapture
jolly–seber

cormack–jolly–seber
bayesian
medicine