Results 211 to 220 of about 38,489 (266)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
American Economic Review, 2023
We propose a nonparametric test for the exclusion and monotonicity assumptions invoked in instrumental variable (IV) designs based on the random assignment of cases to judges. We show its asymptotic validity and demonstrate its finite-sample performance in simulations. We apply our test in an empirical setting from the literature examining the effects
Brigham Frandsen +2 more
openaire +1 more source
We propose a nonparametric test for the exclusion and monotonicity assumptions invoked in instrumental variable (IV) designs based on the random assignment of cases to judges. We show its asymptotic validity and demonstrate its finite-sample performance in simulations. We apply our test in an empirical setting from the literature examining the effects
Brigham Frandsen +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Annual Review of Psychology, 2020
Deceptive claims surround us, embedded in fake news, advertisements, political propaganda, and rumors. How do people know what to believe? Truth judgments reflect inferences drawn from three types of information: base rates, feelings, and consistency with information retrieved from memory.
Nadia M, Brashier, Elizabeth J, Marsh
openaire +2 more sources
Deceptive claims surround us, embedded in fake news, advertisements, political propaganda, and rumors. How do people know what to believe? Truth judgments reflect inferences drawn from three types of information: base rates, feelings, and consistency with information retrieved from memory.
Nadia M, Brashier, Elizabeth J, Marsh
openaire +2 more sources
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2008 Tenured public officials such as judges are often thought to be indifferent to theconcerns of the electorate and, as a result, potentially lacking in discipline butunlikely to pander to public opinion. We investigate this proposition empiricallyusing data on promotion decisions taken by senior English judges between 1985 and2005. Throughout this period
Jordi Blanes I Vidal, Clare Leaver
openaire +3 more sources
Comedy Studies, 2020
The courtroom is, perhaps surprisingly frequently, the site of interludes, interruptions – prone to frustration or humour when the not-so-consistently-well-oiled machinery of justice lets loose a p...
openaire +1 more source
The courtroom is, perhaps surprisingly frequently, the site of interludes, interruptions – prone to frustration or humour when the not-so-consistently-well-oiled machinery of justice lets loose a p...
openaire +1 more source
2006
Abstract Several of the preceding chapters have examined the evolution of the Court’s case law over time in particular fields. In this final chapter, that process of evolution takes centre stage and an attempt is made to set it in its wider legal and political context.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Several of the preceding chapters have examined the evolution of the Court’s case law over time in particular fields. In this final chapter, that process of evolution takes centre stage and an attempt is made to set it in its wider legal and political context.
openaire +1 more source
2012
“ The nation will judge both the offender and judges for themselves.” Jefferson to William B. Giles, April 20, 1807 “…His Honor did not for two days understand either the questions or himself…” Burr on Marshall, September 20, 1807 “Our Treason Laws may be defective, but I believe Marshall’s Conduct strictly and correctly legal as the Laws now ...
openaire +1 more source
“ The nation will judge both the offender and judges for themselves.” Jefferson to William B. Giles, April 20, 1807 “…His Honor did not for two days understand either the questions or himself…” Burr on Marshall, September 20, 1807 “Our Treason Laws may be defective, but I believe Marshall’s Conduct strictly and correctly legal as the Laws now ...
openaire +1 more source
ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2007
In three distinct situations, judges may be obliged to pronounce on doctors’ opinions or conduct. The first of these is where they are deciding actions involving claims for personal injuries in respect of which doctors have given opinions to the court. The second situation in which the judge may be obliged to pronounce on a doctor’s opinion or conduct ...
openaire +2 more sources
In three distinct situations, judges may be obliged to pronounce on doctors’ opinions or conduct. The first of these is where they are deciding actions involving claims for personal injuries in respect of which doctors have given opinions to the court. The second situation in which the judge may be obliged to pronounce on a doctor’s opinion or conduct ...
openaire +2 more sources
Soviet Law and Government, 1988
It happened on the eve of the election. A reader called the editorial office to ask: "Is it true that your correspondent Borin wrote an article defending his relative?" Generally, such "sensations" are nothing new to newspapermen; no sooner do we return from an assignment than the mud is already flying at our backs, faster than speeding bullets.
openaire +1 more source
It happened on the eve of the election. A reader called the editorial office to ask: "Is it true that your correspondent Borin wrote an article defending his relative?" Generally, such "sensations" are nothing new to newspapermen; no sooner do we return from an assignment than the mud is already flying at our backs, faster than speeding bullets.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract There are already some small-scale automated decision-making processes that have been introduced in the judicial arena. In addition, there are AI systems that can ‘nudge’, ‘prompt’, or ‘correct’ judges when making decisions, as well as generative forms of AI that could support judicial decision-making.
Tania Sourdin, Ella Sourdin Brown
openaire +1 more source
Tania Sourdin, Ella Sourdin Brown
openaire +1 more source