Results 211 to 220 of about 16,105 (260)

Judicial Review of the Acts of the Institutions

1996
This chapter examines the main elements of annulment actions brought under Article 173, concentrating on the concept of the ‘reviewable act’, the difficulties of establishing locus standi, and the basic approach which the Court of Justice takes to the grounds for review. All of these elements are essential to a successful action for annulment. The text
openaire   +1 more source

The Congressional Review Act and Judicial Review

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021
Pending before the Supreme Court of the United States is a certiorari petition in a case entitled Kansas Natural Resources Coalition v. U.S. Department of Interior (KNRC). KNRC involves the issue of whether an agency’s refusal to comply with the requirements imposed on agency rulemaking set forth in a federal statute known as the Congressional Review ...
openaire   +1 more source

Judicial Approaches to the Human Rights Act

International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2003
The case law generated in just over two years' operation of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA), enables stocktaking rather than definitive appraisal.1 This article begins by recalling the markedly contrasting roles in United Kingdom law of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) before and after the HRA, the better to appreciate judicial approaches
Bonner, D., Fenwick, H., Harris-Short, S. R.   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Judicial Control of Failure to Act

1996
Articles 173 and 175 (for the text of these provisions see 11.2) are intended to provide complementary remedies; acting illegally and illegally failing to act should be two sides of the same coin. Non-privileged applicants with limited standing under Article 173 should be unable to sue in respect of a failure to adopt a legislative act which they would
openaire   +1 more source

Judicial Review of Legislative Acts in Germany

American Political Science Review, 1927
The German commonwealth is a federation of states, each operating under its own constitution and laws; though subject to the national constitution, which is the fundamental law of the commonwealth, and to other national laws and ordinances. Hence the general problem of judicial review over legislative acts, in so far as it relates to the central ...
F. F. Blachly, Miriam E. Oatman
openaire   +1 more source

Rethinking tortious immunity for judicial acts

Legal Studies, 2013
This paper considers the immunity in tort enjoyed by superior court judges in England and Wales. It suggests, first, that the current level of immunity is set too high; secondly, that the reasons traditionally given for this level of immunity are overwhelmingly unconvincing and that, therefore, thirdly, a lesser degree of immunity (which allows judges ...
openaire   +1 more source

The Judiciary Act of 1789and Judicial Independence

1992
Abstract Among the more peculiar aspects of American historical conscious ness is the fact that we celebrated the bicentennial of the Bill of Rights in 1991 rather than, in analogy to the bicentennial of the Constitution, in 1989. Congressional agreement on the constitutional amendments was reached on September 24, 1789, and, but for the
openaire   +1 more source

Something old, something new? Votes of confidence, parliamentary dissolution, election timing, and judicial review under the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022

Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 2023
Francesco Bromo
exaly  

Torts: Liability of Quasi-Judicial Officer for Judicial Acts

Michigan Law Review, 1926
openaire   +1 more source

The Affordable Care Act and access to care across the cancer control continuum: A review at 10 years

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2020
Leticia Nogueira, Xuesong Han, Ziling Mao   +2 more
exaly