Results 191 to 200 of about 1,040,686 (240)

What Are We Learning About the Research‐Practice Gap From HRD Scholars and HRD Scholar‐Practitioners?

Human Resource Development Quarterly, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT The research‐practice gap (the gap) in HRD remains a significant challenge, hindering the application of academic research to practice and the integration of workplace challenges into research efforts. It is critical for HRD research to address the gap to develop evidence‐based solutions for learning and organizational performance. The purpose
Kelly Moore, Yonjoo Cho
wiley   +1 more source

“Thinking Out Loud” and “Pivoting on the Fly”—An Empirical Review and Critical Incident Study of How Physicians Engage in Incidental Learning Amidst Complexity

Human Resource Development Quarterly, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT This study explores incidental learning among physicians navigating uncertainty during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Using a constructivist research design, we conducted a literature review of 13 empirical studies on incidental learning in complexity and analyzed critical incident interviews with 12 emergency medicine and intensive care physicians ...
Henriette Lundgren, Karen E. Watkins, Victoria J. Marsick, Dimitrios Papanagnou, Urvashi Vaid   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source

Judicial dialogue on the right not to be punished twice

Grabenwarter, Christoph, Grabenwarter, Christoph   +1 more
openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Judicial Review and Constitutional Dialogue

2023
Abstract This chapter argues that Confucian democratic constitutionalism promotes active constitutional dialogue between the branches of the government, especially between the legislature and the court. Even though the equal right to political participation and the equal right to constitutional protection of rights combine to constitute ...
Sungmoon Kim
exaly   +2 more sources

The Judicial Dialogue in Europe

Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law, 2017
Abstract The increasing interdependence among different legal orders makes the role of jurisprudence ever more vital in the European constitutional space. As a consequence, the judicial dialogue is at the centre of academic debates. However, it is still an unclear concept, enveloped by a cloud of scepticism.
exaly   +2 more sources

Judicial dialogue in three silences

New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2018
The Taricco litigation before the Court of Justice and the Italian Constitutional Court has generated a number of fundamental questions about the relationship between EU law and national constitutional law and about the impact of EU law on domestic criminal justice systems.
Valsamis Mitsilegas
exaly   +2 more sources

Judicial Dialogue as a Means of Interpretation

2016
Antonios Tzanakopoulos
exaly   +2 more sources

Cross-Border Judicial Dialogue

Mathias Siems, Tom Gerald Daly
exaly   +2 more sources

The judicial dialogue

Argumentation, 1991
A variety of theoretical positions are emerging to explain the judicial process from such perspectives as hermeneutics, semiotics, critical theory and argumentation/rhetoric. They ask such questions as these: What is the source of judicial authority? How do judges arrive at their decisions? By what logic are decisions to be tested?
openaire   +1 more source

Constitutional Dialogue and Judicial Supremacy

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
This paper analyzes constitutional dialogue by comparing a constitutional system that (almost) entrenches judicial supremacy - the United States - with a constitutional system that seeks to reconcile a judicial and legislative role in constitutional interpretation - Canada. The argument has three parts.
openaire   +1 more source