Results 51 to 60 of about 1,040,686 (240)
The Made‐in‐Africa Evaluation framework: A decolonial approach to program evaluation
American Journal of Community Psychology, EarlyView.Abstract The Made in Africa Evaluation (MAE) framework is a decolonial approach to program evaluation developed by African evaluators over the past 14 years. MAE may be appropriate to community psychologists who practice program evaluation or conduct research in Africa, but little is known about its implementation.
Takatso Sibanda, Robin Lin Miller
wiley +1 more source
Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks
Utrecht Law Review, 2012 This article critically examines the functioning of European judicial networks as one modality of transnational dialogues between judges. In order to provide a conceptual framework, we first explore the meaning of the concepts of 'network', 'dialogue ...
Monica Claes, Maartje de Visser
doaj +1 more source
In the Shadow of Judicial Supremacy: Putting the Idea of Judicial Dialogue in Its Place [PDF]
Ratio Juris, 2015 AbstractI aim to shed theoretical light on the meaning of judicial dialogue by comparing its practice in different jurisdictions. I first examine the practice of dialogic judicial review inWestminster democracies and constitutional departmentalism inAmerican constitutional theory, showing the tendency toward judicial supremacy in both cases.
openaire +1 more source
American Journal of Community Psychology, EarlyView.Abstract In the digital era, adolescent development is deeply embedded in the cyber environment. Despite ongoing debate on the benefits and/or risks that Internet use brings to adolescents in empirical studies, conceptual and theoretical discussion on the influences of the intensity and modalities of Internet use is peripheral.
Linxiao Zhang +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Judicial Dialogue and Fundamental Freedoms: The Main Features of An Established Judicial Trend [PDF]
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018 This article analyses the phenomenon commonly referred to as ‘judicial dialogue’ with the aim of describing its relevant aspects and its importance in the definition and protection of fundamental freedoms, in particular when minority rights are at stake.
openaire +2 more sources
Report of the Judicial Council Agricultural Corporations Advisory Committee
, 2013 application/pdf; "Approved by the Judicial Council - December 6, 2013 ...
Kansas Judicial Council. Agricultural Corporations Advisory Committee.
core +1 more source
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Little is known about how stigma is perceived within psychiatric genetics, a field increasingly central to public discussions about heredity, neurodiversity, and psychiatric risk. Understanding how stigma is perceived and experienced by psychiatric geneticists is important for guiding responsible communication and future stigma‐reduction ...
Anaïs B. Thijssen +14 more
wiley +1 more source
Utrecht Law Review, 2012 Today judges are said to 'see each other not only as servants and representatives of a particular polity, but also as fellow professionals in an endeavour that transcends national borders' (A.M. Slaughter).
Martin Gelter, Mathias Siems
doaj +1 more source
It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction
European Papers, 2020 (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(2), 745-754 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Evolving legal questions surrounding Art. 267 TFEU. - III. Stocktaking: the procedure under pressure? - IV.
Jasper Krommendijk
doaj +1 more source
The Politics of Framing the Student Problem: Inquiries Into Australian Civics Education, 2006–2024
Australian Journal of Social Issues, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Recurring debates about civics, the kinds of history that should, and should not, be taught in school, and ‘standards debates’ about the ‘basics’ typically follow on the heels of recurring moral panics about the ‘declining’ state of ‘our’ education system.
Patrick O'Keeffe +2 more
wiley +1 more source