Results 11 to 20 of about 198,210 (340)
Göttingen Journal of International Law, 2022 The increase in the number of international judicial bodies has led to different international courts deciding similar issues of international law. There is the real possibility that these international judicial bodies, not subject to the supervision of
Francis Maxwell
doaj +1 more source
European Law Open, 2023 The preliminary reference procedure is today the ‘infringement procedure of the European citizen’. Although it was initially designed as a mechanism for judicial cooperation, the procedure soon became an instrument for supranational judicial review of ...
Virginia Passalacqua +1 more
doaj +1 more source
European Papers, 2020 (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(2), 851-869 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Theoretical framework: why national judges participate in judicial dialogue with the CJEU. - III. Judiciary
Urszula Jaremba
doaj +1 more source
Dialog między regionalnymi trybunałami praw człowieka
Studia Prawa Publicznego, 2021 The multiplicity of international judicial authorities makes their mutual interactions a challenge. In recent years, three regional human rights courts, with the competence to hear casus of violations of human rights protected by international law, have
Anna Dąbrowska
doaj +1 more source
coordination through judicial dialogue [PDF]
, 2019 International courts regularly cite each other, in part as a means of building legitimacy. Such international, cross-court use of precedent (or “judicial dialogue”) among the regional human rights courts and the Human Rights Committee has an additional ...
Sandholtz, Wayne
core +1 more source
Constitutional elements of the Global Network
Estudios de Deusto, 2014 The main thesis sustained in the paper is that judicial dialogue is a new concept/category that may solve some problems arising in situations of constitutional pluralism.
Rafael Bustos Gisbert
doaj +1 more source
New Majoritarian Constitutionalism [PDF]
, 2018 Ever since Alexander Bickel coined the phrase “countermajoritarian difficulty,” commentators have frequently described the Supreme Court as either a “majoritarian” or “counter-majoritarian” institution.
Landau, Joseph
core +3 more sources
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2019 This article evaluates the impact of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) jurisprudence in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) case law. Based on empirical and qualitative analysis, it aims to present an overview of citations patterns
Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida
doaj +4 more sources
JUDICIAL DIALOGUE IN THE LIGHT OF PROTOCOL NO. 16 TO THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 2019 The authors discuss legal nature of the Protocol No. 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) which entered into force on 1 August 2018.
Bruna Žuber, Špela Lovšin
doaj +1 more source
Application of the EAEU law by national courts and development of judicial dialogue
Правоприменение, 2022 The subject. This article examines the dialogue between the EAEU Court and national courts, on the one hand, as the application by national courts of the court of the integration organization, on the other hand, – as a recourse by the supranational court
E. B. Diyachenko
doaj +1 more source